WebVetted
+ New  
Site icon
domain

Restoclub.ru (Domain) Investigation Report

Generated on Jul 14, 2026

Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
  Why we think so? 

✅ restoclub.ru looks like an established Russian restaurant guide and review platform, not an obvious scam.

The site has long-running infrastructure signals: a 2004 WHOIS creation date, valid HTTPS, Google Safe Browsing shows no detected risk, and the domain is not on the crypto scam blacklist. Traffic is also substantial, with about 1.1M monthly visits and a strong Russian audience.

There are a few trust quirks worth noting. The WHOIS registrant is hidden, the site relies on multiple third-party services, and one crawler snippet shows a page title that looks like a restaurant review rather than a clean homepage. Still, the contact details, physical location in St. Petersburg, and Google Business profile all point to a real operating business.

Bottom line: the domain looks legitimate, but because the public-facing content is a review platform with mixed user sentiment and moderation concerns, it is best treated with normal caution rather than blind trust.

Confidence Score Our overall confidence rating for this entity based on public signals, activity, and risk checks.
83%

Risk Insights

🕰️

Established domain, not a throwaway

  • WHOIS creation date traces back to 2004.
  • That age is hard to fake and usually lowers scam risk.
  • The domain has had time to build real traffic and reputation.
🛡️

Clean safety screening

  • Google Safe Browsing reports no detected threats.
  • The domain is not on the crypto scam blacklist.
  • No direct malware or phishing flags were found in the provided evidence.
📍

Real business footprint

  • Public email and phone numbers are listed.
  • Google Places shows a St. Petersburg address.
  • This looks like an active company, not an anonymous landing page.
⚠️

Main caution is platform quality

  • User complaints mention booking friction and moderation issues.
  • Those complaints affect trust, but they do not prove fraud.
  • Treat listings and reservations with normal verification steps.

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • The WHOIS registrant is not publicly visible, so ownership transparency is limited.
  • Crawler snippets and search results show mixed-quality user complaints about moderation and restaurant bookings, which affects trust in the platform experience.

Detailed Checks & Insights

0-100 Scale

Domain age and registration maturity

Score: 92
Passed

"WHOIS creation date is a strong positive signal here."

Reason: The domain was created in 2004, which gives it a long operating history and lowers the chance of a throwaway scam site.

Registrar and DNS consistency

Score: 78
Passed

"Some registrant privacy remains, but the setup is normal for a real site."

Reason: The domain uses standard registrar and DNS infrastructure, including recognized Russian and CloudNS nameservers.

HTTPS and SSL health

Score: 90
Passed

"Certificate dates appear current and there is no sign of a broken HTTPS setup."

Reason: TLS is valid and currently active, which is expected for a legitimate public website.

Traffic scale and consistency

Score: 84
Passed

"Traffic is Russia-heavy and not obviously artificial from the limited data provided."

Reason: SimilarWeb-style data shows about 1.1M monthly visits, which is consistent with a real, established service.

Engagement quality

Score: 70
Passed

"This looks more like a content platform than a transactional scam funnel."

Reason: Bounce rate and pages per visit are reasonable for a directory/review platform, though not exceptional.

Public contactability

Score: 88
Passed

"Multiple contact paths usually indicate a real operating business."

Reason: The site exposes a working-looking email, several phone numbers, social accounts, and a physical address.

Platform reputation and user sentiment

Score: 68
Passed

"Mixed sentiment is common for review platforms, so this is a mild caution rather than a scam indicator."

Reason: Search results show some complaints about booking and moderation, but not a clear fraud pattern.

Safety blacklist screening

Score: 96
Passed

"This is one of the strongest positive signals in the evidence set."

Reason: No Google Safe Browsing risk and no crypto scam blacklist hit were found.

Business legitimacy signals

Score: 82
Passed

"This supports the conclusion that the domain is tied to a real company."

Reason: Google Places shows a real St. Petersburg business listing with a physical location and review history.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    If you plan to rely on the site, verify the specific restaurant, listing, or booking flow before paying or sharing sensitive details.

  • 2

    Check the contact email and phone number against the site’s own contact page before making any reservation-related decisions.

  • 3

    If you are evaluating a listing on restoclub.ru, read the recent reviews and confirm the same venue on Google Maps or the restaurant’s own website.

Key Evidence & Citations

📌 More actions for Restoclub.ru:

🕵🏻 Keep vetting

🌐 Vet new Website »

Run an investigation on any domain. Verify legitimacy before you pay or subscribe!

 👤 Find any Person »

Find and investigate any person / online identity on 7 social media platforms.

 📞 Investigate Phone No. »

Attribute a phone number to real-world identities, linked online accounts, carrier data, emails, etc.

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.

Analyst Briefing

Get answers grounded in the sourced data. Citations like will link to the evidence locker.

Evidence Locker
// Waiting for data ingestion...

Evidence Locked

This raw JSON payload contains sensitive intelligence data .

Unlock
824 data points collected