WebVetted
+ New  
Site icon
domain

Monkey.cool (Domain) Investigation Report

Generated on Jun 6, 2026

Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

⚠️ monkey.cool looks like a real service, but it carries meaningful trust and safety risks. The domain has been registered since 2016, uses valid HTTPS, and points to Amazon/AWS and Google email services, which are all normal operational signals. Still, the site is tied to the Monkey random video chat app, and outside reviews repeatedly flag weak age verification, sexual content exposure, and scam/harassment risk. Traffic is modest at about 18.2K monthly visits, and the WHOIS registrant is redacted, so you should treat it as caution rather than a clean safe bet. 🛡️

Confidence Score Our overall confidence rating for this entity based on public signals, activity, and risk checks.
57%

Risk Insights

⚠️

Real service, but not low-risk

  • The domain is old and technically configured like a real service.
  • The product itself has repeated safety complaints.
  • That combination means legitimacy does not equal trustworthiness.
🛡️

Safety concerns are the main issue

  • Independent reviews point to exposure to explicit content and harassment.
  • Weak age verification is a recurring complaint.
  • This matters most if teens or minors could use it.
✅

Operational signals look normal

  • Valid SSL is in place.
  • AWS, Google Workspace, SPF, and DMARC are configured.
  • Those signals support basic authenticity, but they do not solve the trust concerns.

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Reports describe exposure to sexual content, adults contacting minors, and scams on the Monkey app.
  • The WHOIS contact data is redacted, so there is no clear public owner or accountable operator in the record provided.

Detailed Checks & Insights

0-100 Scale

Domain age and continuity

Score: 84
Passed

"Long-lived domains are less likely to be throwaway scams, though age alone does not prove trustworthiness."

Reason: The domain has been registered since 2016 and is still active, which is a strong continuity signal.

Ownership transparency

Score: 36
Failed

"That does not prove wrongdoing, but it reduces accountability and makes verification harder."

Reason: The registrant details are redacted, so the public record does not clearly identify the operator.

Infrastructure legitimacy

Score: 81
Passed

"This is consistent with a real service, not a bare-minimum phishing setup."

Reason: The site uses common, legitimate services like AWS hosting, Route 53, Google Workspace, DMARC, SPF, and valid SSL.

Traffic and user footprint

Score: 44
Failed

"A small footprint is not inherently bad, but it offers less reassurance than a widely used product."

Reason: Traffic is modest at about 18.2K monthly visits, with a low global rank and limited public momentum.

Public reputation and complaints

Score: 28
Failed

"This is the strongest negative signal in the evidence set."

Reason: Outside reviews and safety write-ups repeatedly mention sexual content, harassment, scams, and weak age verification.

Blacklist and malware checks

Score: 92
Passed

"A clean blacklist check is helpful, but it cannot override user-safety complaints or product risks."

Reason: No Google Safe Browsing hit and no crypto scam blacklist flag were reported.

Contactability

Score: 39
Failed

"The site does expose social profiles, but those are weaker for support or dispute resolution."

Reason: No email addresses or phone numbers were scraped from the site, so direct contact options are limited in the evidence provided.

Trademark and naming risk

Score: 63
Passed

"There is some naming overlap, so it is worth checking branding and ownership more carefully if you are considering a business relationship."

Reason: The USPTO results show older MONKEY marks, but nothing in the evidence directly proves this domain is impersonating a current trademark owner.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    If you plan to use it, read the app’s privacy policy and terms first, then check what data it collects and shares.

  • 2

    Avoid sharing your real name, school, phone number, or location in chat.

  • 3

    If a minor might use it, do not allow unsupervised access; the safety reports are too strong to ignore.

  • 4

    Look for refund, support, and account-ban policies before paying for any premium features.

Key Evidence & Citations

📌 More actions for Monkey.cool:

🕵🏻 Keep vetting

🌐 Vet new Website »

Run an investigation on any domain. Verify legitimacy before you pay or subscribe!

 👤 Find any Person »

Find and investigate any person / online identity on 7 social media platforms.

 📞 Investigate Phone No. »

Attribute a phone number to real-world identities, linked online accounts, carrier data, emails, etc.

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.

Analyst Briefing

Get answers grounded in the sourced data. Citations like will link to the evidence locker.

Evidence Locker
// Waiting for data ingestion...

Evidence Locked

This raw JSON payload contains sensitive intelligence data .

Unlock
1.5K data points collected