WebVetted
+ New  
Site icon
domain

Metacritic.com (Domain) Investigation Report

Generated on Jun 18, 2026

Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
  Why we think so? 

Metacritic.com looks like a long-running, legitimate review site, not a scam. ✅

It has strong trust signals: the domain was registered in 1999, the SSL certificate is valid, Google Safe Browsing found no risk, and the site is not blacklisted for crypto scams. Traffic is also substantial, with about 13M monthly visits and a global rank around #4,501.

There are some reputational caveats. Public complaints focus on Metacritic’s scoring methods, review moderation, and occasional abuse of its brand in fraudulent job postings. Those are real concerns, but they point to controversy and impersonation, not evidence that the core domain is fraudulent.

Confidence Score Our overall confidence rating for this entity based on public signals, activity, and risk checks.
90%

Risk Insights

🛡️

Strong legitimacy profile

  • Old domain: registered in 1999.
  • Valid SSL and standard DNS setup.
  • No Safe Browsing or crypto blacklist hit.
📈

Traffic matches a real media property

  • About 13M monthly visits.
  • Global rank around #4,501.
  • Traffic is mostly direct and organic search.
⚠️

Main risk is reputation, not fraud

  • Complaints focus on score weighting and moderation.
  • Fraudulent job postings use the Metacritic name.
  • Core site evidence still points to legitimacy.

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • There are documented complaints about opaque scoring, review bombing, and moderation disputes, which can affect trust in the platform even if they do not prove fraud.
  • Fandom has warned about fraudulent job postings using the Metacritic name, so impersonation risk is real even though the core domain looks legitimate.

Detailed Checks & Insights

0-100 Scale

Domain age and registration history

Score: 98
Passed

"Very old domain with long continuity."

Reason: The domain was registered in 1999, which is a strong legitimacy signal for a major media property.

WHOIS privacy and ownership traceability

Score: 84
Passed

"Privacy is normal for large brands, so this is not a concern by itself."

Reason: Registrant privacy is used, but the ownership trail is still coherent through historical trademark and corporate records.

Security blacklist status

Score: 100
Passed

"Clean security reputation in the provided checks."

Reason: No Google Safe Browsing threats were detected and the crypto scam blacklist check was negative.

Traffic legitimacy

Score: 94
Passed

"About 13M monthly visits and a global rank near #4,501."

Reason: The site has meaningful traffic volume and a realistic mix of direct and search traffic, which is consistent with a known consumer brand.

Brand/trademark alignment

Score: 96
Passed

"Strong brand continuity signal."

Reason: USPTO records show live METACRITIC trademarks and a chain of ownership consistent with a long-established business.

Corporate contact and infrastructure signals

Score: 88
Passed

"Normal for a legitimate publisher, though no direct email contacts were scraped."

Reason: The site uses standard business infrastructure such as Google Workspace mail, Cloudflare, and active social accounts.

Public reputation and complaints

Score: 62
Failed

"These reduce trust somewhat, but they do not show the core domain is fraudulent."

Reason: There are recurring complaints about scoring opacity, review moderation, and impersonation scams using the brand name.

Evidence of scam or phishing activity

Score: 90
Passed

"Impersonation risk exists, but the site itself looks clean."

Reason: The available checks do not show the domain itself on scam or phishing lists.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    If you want to verify you are on the real site, type metacritic.com directly into your browser and avoid links from emails or ads.

  • 2

    Treat any job offer, payment request, or account alert claiming to be from Metacritic with caution unless it comes from an official fandom.com or metacritic.com address.

  • 3

    Use Metacritic as one reference point for reviews, not the only one, because its scores are often criticized for weighting and conversion choices.

Key Evidence & Citations

📌 More actions for Metacritic.com:

🕵🏻 Keep vetting

🌐 Vet new Website »

Run an investigation on any domain. Verify legitimacy before you pay or subscribe!

 👤 Find any Person »

Find and investigate any person / online identity on 7 social media platforms.

 📞 Investigate Phone No. »

Attribute a phone number to real-world identities, linked online accounts, carrier data, emails, etc.

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.

Analyst Briefing

Get answers grounded in the sourced data. Citations like will link to the evidence locker.

Evidence Locker
// Waiting for data ingestion...

Evidence Locked

This raw JSON payload contains sensitive intelligence data .

Unlock
2.2K data points collected