WebVetted
+ New  
Site icon
domain

Jellyfin.org (Domain) Investigation Report

Generated on Jun 5, 2026

Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
  Why we think so? 

✅ jellyfin.org looks like a legitimate, established open-source software project site. It has been registered since 2018, uses a reputable registrar (Gandi SAS), and shows normal technical setup with HTTPS, Cloudflare, Gandi DNS, and active DNS records for mail and verification. Traffic is real and substantial for a niche software project, with about 1.27M monthly visits and a global rank around #38,445. We did not find blacklist hits, Google Safe Browsing issues, or obvious scam reports in the evidence set. The only caution is a USPTO result showing a separate JELLYFIN trademark record that was once registered and later cancelled for maintenance reasons, but that does not by itself indicate fraud.

Confidence Score Our overall confidence rating for this entity based on public signals, activity, and risk checks.
91%

Risk Insights

🧩

Established open-source project

  • Domain age dates back to 2018.
  • GitHub and social links match a real software project.
  • No scam blacklist hits were found.
📈

Traffic looks real

  • About 1.27M monthly visits.
  • Global rank is around #38,445.
  • Engagement is normal, with roughly 3.4 pages per visit.
⚖️

Legal note, not a fraud signal

  • USPTO returned a JELLYFIN trademark record.
  • The main registration was later cancelled for maintenance.
  • That matters for trademark context, but it does not point to a scam.

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • A USPTO result shows a JELLYFIN mark that was once registered but later cancelled for Section 8 maintenance reasons; that is a trademark housekeeping issue, not a direct scam signal.

Detailed Checks & Insights

0-100 Scale

Domain age and registration stability

Score: 92
Passed

"Older, stable registration lowers the chance of a disposable scam domain."

Reason: The domain has been registered since 2018, which is a strong legitimacy signal.

Registrar and WHOIS transparency

Score: 88
Passed

"Registrant privacy is common and not itself suspicious."

Reason: Gandi is a reputable registrar, and the WHOIS data includes normal administrative fields and abuse contacts.

Technical hygiene

Score: 91
Passed

"The DNS and SSL setup looks routine rather than improvised."

Reason: The site uses HTTPS, standard DNS, and valid mail/SPF records, which fits a real project.

Traffic and popularity sanity check

Score: 86
Passed

"About 1.27M monthly visits and 3.4 pages per visit support real demand."

Reason: Traffic volume and engagement are plausible for a widely used niche software project.

Public reputation and coverage

Score: 84
Passed

"Coverage is mostly instructional rather than investigative, but it still supports legitimacy."

Reason: The project appears in recent news and tutorials, which is consistent with an active public product.

Blacklist and phishing checks

Score: 97
Passed

"This is one of the strongest low-risk signals in the evidence set."

Reason: No Google Safe Browsing or crypto blacklist hits were found.

Trademark and brand conflict review

Score: 73
Passed

"This is a mild legal note, not a fraud indicator."

Reason: A JELLYFIN trademark record exists, but the main result is a historical cancellation, not an active conflict.

Direct contact and ecosystem footprint

Score: 89
Passed

"No direct email or phone was scraped, but the project footprint is credible."

Reason: The site is connected to GitHub and social profiles, which is what you expect from a real open-source project.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    If you plan to download software, still verify you are on the official jellyfin.org domain before installing anything.

  • 2

    Check the GitHub organization linked from the site if you want to confirm the project’s source code and release history.

  • 3

    For payments or donations, use only the official links shown on the site and avoid third-party mirrors.

Key Evidence & Citations

📌 More actions for Jellyfin.org:

🕵🏻 Keep vetting

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.

Analyst Briefing

Get answers grounded in the sourced data. Citations like will link to the evidence locker.

Evidence Locker
// Waiting for data ingestion...

Evidence Locked

This raw JSON payload contains sensitive intelligence data .

Unlock
767 data points collected