WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Virtualbox.org

Report Date
October 6, 2025
Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
  Why we think so? 

VirtualBox.org is the official site for Oracle’s VirtualBox virtualization software. The domain is long‑standing (registered in 2006), serves ~2.6M visits/month, and uses Oracle/Akamai infrastructure and a DigiCert TLS certificate. No malware/phishing or crypto blacklist hits were found. There are licensing and billing disputes around Oracle’s proprietary Extension Pack — a legal/compliance risk for businesses but not evidence of fraud. Overall verdict: ✅ Safe / Trusted.

Confidence Score
88%

Risk Insights

🟢

High traffic, official product

  • Estimated ~2.6M visits/month (SimilarWeb).
  • Top organic keyword: “virtualbox” — matches product name.
  • Active press coverage and recent releases.
⚠️

Licensing risk for businesses

  • Extension Pack requires a proprietary license for some uses.
  • Published billing/dispute reports mean organizations should confirm compliance.

Contradictory Signals

These signals point to a legitimate project that still carries a separate licensing risk for businesses.

Signal A: Long domain age, high traffic, and reputable infrastructure indicate legitimacy.

Signal B: Public billing disputes over the Extension Pack raise legal/financial risk for commercial users.

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Oracle has enforced paid licensing for the Extension Pack and there are public billing/dispute reports; this creates legal/financial risk for businesses using that component.
  • WHOIS registrant details are not publicly listed (registrant null) because the domain uses a corporate registrar/brand protection service; this reduces direct registrant transparency.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

WHOIS / domain age

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Registered Oct 16, 2006; registrar MarkMonitor Inc.; updated 2025-09-20. Long registration age (≈19 years) is a strong legitimacy signal."

Reason: Domain registered in 2006 and maintained with a corporate registrar (MarkMonitor), which supports long-term legitimacy.

SSL / TLS

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Certificate issuer: DigiCert TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1; valid from 2025-07-23 to 2026-03-04. No expired/invalid certificate detected."

Reason: TLS certificate is valid and issued by DigiCert, indicating proper HTTPS deployment.

Hosting & infrastructure

Score: 92/100
Passed

"Technologies include Akamai CDN/Akamai Edge, Oracle name servers, and enterprise analytics services (Adobe, Oracle)."

Reason: Site uses Akamai CDN and Oracle-hosted DNS, both reputable enterprise services uncommon for scam operations.

Traffic & popularity

Score: 90/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb global rank ~24,424 and estimated monthly visits ~2.6M (time-on-site ~122s, pages/visit ~2.4)."

Reason: High global traffic rank and stabilizing monthly visits consistent with a widely used open-source product.

Blacklist / Safe Browsing

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Google Safe Browsing returned no matched threats. Crypto scam sniffer reported blacklisted: false."

Reason: No hits on Google Safe Browsing or crypto scam blacklists were found.

Contact & verifiable channels

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Found vbox-trac mailing list email, Twitter, Facebook pages, and GitHub organization links on site pages."

Reason: Official mailing lists, social accounts, and GitHub links are published on the site, enabling community verification.

Trademark / brand impersonation

Score: 85/100
Passed

"USPTO search for the queried term returned zero results in the provided evidence set."

Reason: No USPTO trademark entries were returned for the specific query, reducing immediate impersonation concerns.

News / external reputation

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Multiple recent articles (e.g., Phoronix) cover product releases; community forums discuss licensing but not scams."

Reason: Consistent technical press coverage and tutorials exist; no credible reports of fraud tied to the official site.

Legal & licensing risk

Score: 60/100
Failed

"Public reports and forum threads describe Oracle contacting organizations about Extension Pack usage and related billing disputes; this affects commercial users and should be verified by enterprises."

Reason: Oracle’s licensing for the Extension Pack has prompted billing disputes and controversy, which is a real business/legal risk.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Download installers only from official virtualbox.org pages or Oracle mirrors and verify checksums if available.

  • 2

    If you use the Extension Pack in a business, have your legal/IT team confirm licensing requirements before deploying at scale.

  • 3

    Check installer behavior carefully (during install) and avoid bundled third‑party offers if any appear.

  • 4

    Report suspicious emails claiming to be Oracle/VirtualBox billing or audits to Oracle and ignore unsolicited payment demands until verified.

  • 5

    If you need further verification, compare the SHA256 checksums of installers against values posted on the official site or Oracle download pages.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.