WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Undermyroof.app

Report Date
October 8, 2025
Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
  Why we think so? 

Under My Roof (undermyroof.app) appears to be a small home-inventory app and companion site with an App Store presence, social profiles, and press mentions. There are no phishing or crypto-blacklist matches and no public scam reports in news or review aggregators. Technical traces show a recently issued SSL cert and limited WHOIS detail, and site traffic is very low (hundreds of visits/month), so the project looks legitimate but small and lightly maintained. Recommendation: proceed with normal caution — verify contact details before sharing sensitive data or payments.

Confidence Score
68%

Risk Insights

🟢

Low traffic but real product presence

  • About 500 visits in Sept 2025 — niche landing page or small user base.
  • App Store listings and user guides show a functional product outside the website.
✅

No blacklist or phishing flags found

  • Google Safe Browsing returned no threats.
  • Crypto scam scanner did not list the domain.
⚠️

Contact details incomplete on site

  • Scraper did not find support email or phone — only social links.
  • Verify contact channels before sharing sensitive info.

Contradictory Signals

Public signals show a legitimate app, but limited traffic and sparse registry data mean confirmation should come from app-store developer contact or company records.

Signal A: Press coverage and app-store listings indicate an established product

Signal B: Very low traffic and empty WHOIS reduce traceability

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • No public WHOIS record was returned in the evidence set and WHOIS array is empty, reducing traceability of the registrant.
  • SSL certificate is newly issued (valid from 2025-09-04) and has a short validity window in the record, which can indicate a recent registration or short-term hosting.
  • Scraper found no support email or phone number on the site; only social links are available, which makes direct verification harder.
  • Very low traffic and low global rank mean fewer third‑party signals (fewer reviews, fewer independent confirmations).

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

identity

Score: 70/100
Passed

"The product is consistently named across the site, app pages, and third‑party writeups; publisher references (Binary Formations) match LinkedIn and user guides, which supports identity verification."

Reason: Site and app listings point to a consistent product identity and a publisher (Binary Formations) with LinkedIn presence.

reputation

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Independent articles (iMore) and app-review aggregators show favorable commentary and no scam reports; no negative consumer‑protection hits found in the provided search results."

Reason: Press mentions and app reviews are positive, and there are no flagged complaints or BBB fraud reports in the evidence.

technical

Score: 55/100
Failed

"DNS points to Hover nameservers and an A record exists, but absence of WHOIS data and a short/ recent SSL lifecycle reduce technical traceability and raise a need for caution."

Reason: Technical footprint is minimal: low traffic, empty WHOIS in the provided record, and a recently issued SSL certificate.

content

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Documentation (user guides) and App Store descriptions match the website messaging; content does not request unusual financial flows or sensitive credentials on the landing page."

Reason: Site content, user guides, and app descriptions align and describe a non-financial home-inventory product.

legal

Score: 60/100
Passed

"USPTO search returned no matching trademarks for the domain string; no lawsuits or consumer-complaint records surfaced in the aggregated results."

Reason: No USPTO trademark conflicts or public legal actions were found in the provided evidence.

business_validity

Score: 65/100
Passed

"App Store entries, a company LinkedIn and user guides support that a legitimate small business operates the app, though public contact emails are missing and traffic is low."

Reason: There is a plausible business presence (app listings, company references), but limited independent coverage and contact transparency lower confidence.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Open the App Store listing (iOS) and check recent user reviews, update dates, and developer contact listed on the app page.

  • 2

    Confirm a reachable support email or phone number on the site or developer pages before sending personal data.

  • 3

    Verify ownership via LinkedIn/company pages (Binary Formations) and cross-check developer name on the App Store and the site.

  • 4

    Avoid sending money or large payments through the site; use official app-store payment channels or verified vendor portals.

  • 5

    If you need higher assurance, request a business address or invoice and confirm via an independent source (LinkedIn/company registration).

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.