WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Simpcity.cr

Report Date
October 8, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

Quick verdict: ⚠️ simpcity.cr is a very high-traffic, adult-oriented community site with solid technical infrastructure (Cloudflare/CDN, HTTPS) and large monthly visits (~215M). Major safety scans (Google Safe Browsing, crypto blacklist) show no active malware or crypto fraud flags, and news coverage exists for “Simp City” events. However, the domain has sparse WHOIS contact info, appears recently registered, and some third-party filters/ratings are mixed or list the domain on phishing blocklists. No credible user-reported financial losses were found in the evidence set. Recommendation: use caution — do not provide payment or sensitive personal info until you verify independently.

Confidence Score
50%

Risk Insights

🛡️

Large audience but limited operator transparency

  • SimilarWeb estimates ~215M monthly visits and global rank ~103 — site is widely used.
  • WHOIS lacks public registrant details and appears recently registered, which lowers identity confidence.
  • Recommendation: avoid payments until operator info is verifiable.

Contradictory Signals

Large sites usually have clear ownership, but this domain combines high traffic with limited registrant transparency — increases suspicion despite professional hosting.

Signal A: High technical maturity and traffic (Cloudflare, CDN, valid SSL, 215M visits)

Signal B: Sparse WHOIS, mixed trust scores and community blocklist mentions

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • WHOIS registrant information is missing and the domain appears recently registered, so ownership is not transparent.
  • Some security/community lists (reported in aggregators) include simpcity.cr in phishing/blacklist filters, which increases caution.
  • No contact emails were found by the scrapers, only a phone number from a third‑party record; limited contact channels reduce accountability.
  • Adult content classification increases privacy and abuse risk; users should be careful about sharing identifying material.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

WHOIS / domain registration

Score: 45/100
Failed

"WHOIS shows registrar NIC-REG1 and no public registrant name; recent creation/expiry timestamps in records indicate low historical provenance."

Reason: Registrant details are not public and the domain appears recently registered, reducing identity confidence.

SSL / TLS and hosting

Score: 85/100
Passed

"SSL is present and valid in the snapshot; site uses Cloudflare and Bunny CDN which improves delivery, DDoS protection and TLS termination."

Reason: Valid SSL certificate and use of Cloudflare/CDNs implies competent technical operations and encrypted transport.

Traffic & popularity

Score: 90/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb reports ~215M visits, global rank ~103, and pageviews/time-on-site metrics that suggest a large, active user base."

Reason: Extremely high estimated monthly visits and low bounce rate indicate broad usage and engagement, atypical for short-lived scam pages.

Blacklists & malware scans

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Google Safe Browsing and crypto-scam tool returned no threats; however, third-party community filters aggregated by reputation tools have entries that flag phishing risk."

Reason: No matches in Google Safe Browsing or the supplied crypto-scam sniffers, but community blocklists show some flags.

Contact transparency

Score: 40/100
Failed

"Scrapers found social handles and a phone number listed in a third‑party domain report, but no verifiable business email or postal address on the site."

Reason: No site-hosted email addresses found and only a third‑party phone record exists, making operator verification harder.

Brand & trademark conflicts

Score: 65/100
Passed

"USPTO query returned no results for the exact domain string; separate similarly named entities exist but were not tied to simpcity.cr in the evidence."

Reason: No clear USPTO trademark matches for this exact query in the provided evidence, reducing immediate impersonation concerns.

News & external coverage

Score: 60/100
Passed

"Multiple news sources document Simp City events and residencies; some articles also discuss controversies regarding unauthorized content distribution tied to similarly named platforms."

Reason: Several news articles reference a 'Simp City' brand or events, which supports real-world presence but may not map exactly to this domain.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Do not submit payments or full personal/financial details on simpcity.cr until you confirm identity through multiple channels (official social accounts, independent reviews).

  • 2

    Check the site from a clean device and run URL through multiple scanners (Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, AdGuard lists) before downloading content.

  • 3

    If you need to contact the operator, ask for verifiable business contact info (registered company name, verifiable email or phone on a business registry) and avoid using forms that request payment or sensitive PII.

  • 4

    Search for user reports on reputable forums and complaint sites (ScamAdviser, Gridinsoft, Scamdoc) and re-check blocklists periodically — reputation can change quickly.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.