WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Readera.org

Report Date
October 8, 2025
Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
  Why we think so? 

ReadEra (readera.org) appears to be a legitimate e‑reader app/site with steady traffic, an active SSL certificate, and public contact channels. The domain is long‑running (registered in 2013) and receives hundreds of thousands of visits per month according to SimilarWeb/SimilarTech. There are no hits on Google Safe Browsing or crypto‑scam blacklists, and a support email (support@readera.org) and social profiles are published. However, WHOIS shows a redacted registrant and some traffic reports show unusual country mixes and a relatively high bounce rate, which merit caution if you plan to transact or share sensitive information.

Confidence Score
79%

Risk Insights

✅

Long‑running app with real users

  • Domain registered in 2013 and still active.
  • SimilarWeb/SimilarTech report hundreds of thousands of monthly visits.
  • Public support email and social accounts exist.
⚠️

Verify before paying

  • WHOIS is privacy‑protected; registrant contact not public.
  • Traffic source discrepancies and high bounce rate in one dataset suggest mixed engagement.
  • Use store listings and payment protections for subscriptions or purchases.

Contradictory Signals

Different analytics providers report different country distributions and engagement metrics; treat traffic geography cautiously.

Signal A: SimilarWeb/SimilarTech indicate leading country mix includes US and moderate bounce (~49%).

Signal B: Alternate traffic dataset reports majority visitors from Russia/Kazakhstan and high bounce (73%).

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • WHOIS registrant information is redacted/private, reducing transparency about the domain owner.
  • Conflicting traffic signals: SimilarWeb indicates top country mix that includes the U.S., while another traffic dataset reports heavy Russian/Kazakh traffic and a high bounce rate (73%), suggesting inconsistent analytics between sources.
  • Some third‑party screenshots and directory hits (Google Places results) appear unrelated or noisy, which can complicate automated reputation signals.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age and WHOIS

Score: 90/100
Passed

"WHOIS shows registrar Internet Domain Service BS Corp and registration date 2013-06-13; registrant details are redacted (privacy). Long registration is positive; privacy reduces owner transparency."

Reason: Domain registered in 2013 and actively updated, which aligns with legitimate long‑running services.

Traffic and usage signals

Score: 85/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb/SimilarTech report ~214k–360k monthly visits and global rank ~173,511; an alternate dataset (Alexa) shows lower rank but still active usage. Conflicting country breakdowns exist and should be noted."

Reason: Multiple analytics providers report substantial monthly visits and an established global rank.

Technical hygiene (TLS, SPF, server)

Score: 88/100
Passed

"TLS valid through 2026-11-03; DNS has SPF including _spf.google.com and an A record pointing to 82.118.243.237. These are standard and expected for a legitimate service."

Reason: Site uses valid TLS (Sectigo) and SPF/TXT records; server identified as nginx.

Blacklist / malware checks

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Google Safe Browsing returned no matched threats; crypto scam sniffer flagged the domain as not blacklisted."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing or crypto scam lists.

Contact and support availability

Score: 82/100
Passed

"support@readera.org is listed across site pages and social links (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn) are present; phone numbers appear in APK listing pages but verify via official store pages."

Reason: Public support email and social profiles increase accountability.

Trademark / brand impersonation

Score: 90/100
Passed

"USPTO search returned zero results for 'readera.org' in the provided dataset; continue monitoring for similar brand claims."

Reason: No USPTO trademark conflicts found for the queried term.

Third‑party reputation and news

Score: 75/100
Passed

"News search returned generic reading-related articles and app lists; Perplexity checks found no reported user financial losses tied to readera.org in the provided results."

Reason: No credible news reports accusing the site of scams, and general press references are about reading/education broadly.

Suspicious red flags (conflicting metrics, bounce rate)

Score: 45/100
Failed

"Website traffic stats dataset lists bounce 73.1% and heavy traffic from Russia/Kazakhstan, which conflicts with SimilarWeb's country mix; this inconsistency reduces confidence for money/identity transactions."

Reason: Conflicting analytics and a high bounce rate in one dataset raise caution for transactional trust without extra verification.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    If you only plan to read free content, proceed but avoid giving payment or sensitive personal data unless you confirm the app/store listing is official.

  • 2

    Verify the app listing in Google Play or the Apple App Store and check store reviews and install counts before downloading.

  • 3

    If you must pay or subscribe, use a credit card or payment method with fraud protection and confirm the checkout origin (domain and HTTPS certificate) at the time of payment.

  • 4

    Email support@readera.org for any unclear policy or billing questions and keep screenshots of communications.

  • 5

    Report suspicious transactions or phishing attempts to your bank and to the platform (Google/Apple) if the app listing looks fake.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.