WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Mangataro.com

Report Date
October 6, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

Quick verdict: ⚠️ Suspicious. The domain mangataro.com was registered very recently (April 11, 2025), uses privacy-redacted WHOIS and a CNAME that points to a third-party host (vvhan/Cloudflare IP). There is effectively no measured traffic and no site-collected email contact; social profiles exist but do not prove business legitimacy. Safe Browsing and crypto-blacklist checks are clean, and there are no USPTO trademarks matching the name — but the combination of fresh registration, privacy redaction, zero traffic, and a CNAME to a generic host raises moderate risk. Take extra caution: avoid giving personal or payment details until you verify ownership and trust signals.

Confidence Score
28%

Risk Insights

⚠️

New, private registration → higher verification needed

  • Registered April 11, 2025 with privacy redaction.
  • No WHOIS owner info to confirm legitimacy.
  • Treat requests for money or personal data as high risk.
🕵️

No traffic but social footprint exists

  • SimilarWeb shows zero visits in recent months.
  • Social profiles can help verify activity, but they can be faked or secondary.
  • Check recent posts, follower signals, and cross-links to an official business identity.

Contradictory Signals

Automated blacklist checks may lag or miss new/low-traffic scams; clean blacklist results reduce immediate malware concerns but don't confirm legitimacy.

Signal A: Google Safe Browsing and crypto blacklist show no threats

Signal B: WHOIS privacy, fresh registration and zero traffic suggest suspicious/temporary site

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Very recent registration date with privacy-protected WHOIS, common in disposable or fraudulent sites.
  • No measurable traffic or engagement data in SimilarWeb (0 visits), suggesting no established audience.
  • CNAME to vvhan / Cloudflare IP and use of shared DNS, which is typical of proxy/CDN setups used by temporary or mirrored sites.
  • Absence of official contact emails and only social account links scraped; phone number found appears to be a long numeric string from a social post, not a standard business phone.
  • Similar domain names (.net/.org) show community warnings in public queries, increasing impersonation risk.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

WHOIS: registration age and redaction

Score: 15/100
Failed

"Fresh domains with privacy-protected WHOIS are common for throwaway, proxy, or potentially fraudulent sites; this increases risk because ownership is hard to verify."

Reason: Very recent registration date (2025-04-11) and registrant data redacted via privacy service.

Traffic & engagement (SimilarWeb)

Score: 20/100
Failed

"SimilarWeb lists zero estimated monthly visits and zero engagement metrics for the sampled months, indicating the site has no established audience."

Reason: No measurable visits or engagement reported in recent months.

Technical setup (DNS, CNAME, hosting)

Score: 45/100
Failed

"Using a CNAME to third-party proxy/CDN services is not itself malicious, but it often correlates with temporary sites, mirrors, or sites that attempt to hide origin servers."

Reason: CNAME points to vvhan (mangataro.cf.cname.vvhan.com) and resolves to an IP associated with Cloudflare; suggests proxy/CDN usage.

Contact details & ownership transparency

Score: 20/100
Failed

"Legitimate businesses usually list a contact email and clearer phone/address; absence of standard contact points reduces trust and makes dispute resolution harder."

Reason: No site emails found; only social profiles and a nonstandard phone string were scraped.

Blacklists & malware scans

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Cleared common automated blacklist checks in the provided data, which lowers immediate technical threat concerns like known malware distribution."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing and no crypto-scam blacklist hits.

Trademark / brand impersonation (USPTO)

Score: 70/100
Passed

"No exact-match trademarks were returned, reducing a specific legal-impersonation signal; this does not rule out infringement or later claims."

Reason: No USPTO trademark records found for the query string.

News & public reports

Score: 45/100
Failed

"News results relate to an artist named 'Man Gataro' and some search summaries flag similarly named domains (.net/.org) as risky; absence of direct reporting on the .com site leaves uncertainty."

Reason: No direct news articles or public complaints tied to mangataro.com; however, similar names appear in news and community warnings.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Do not provide payment or personal information on the site until ownership is verified.

  • 2

    Inspect the site pages manually for visible copyright notices, business address, and consistent contact emails; capture screenshots and URLs.

  • 3

    Verify the social profiles listed (Twitter / Instagram / Facebook / YouTube) for consistent branding, recent activity, and contact details that match site claims.

  • 4

    Run the domain through additional reputation services (ScamAdviser, VirusTotal) and check community forums for user reports about mangataro.net/.org variants.

  • 5

    If you suspect fraud or malware, report the URL to Google Safe Browsing and to your local consumer protection agency; block the site and avoid downloads.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.