Domain Due Diligence
Report for Liltv.me
Why we think so?
Quick take: liltv.me is a small streaming/download site with modest real traffic and active social profiles, but several ordinary trust gaps that warrant caution. The domain was registered on 2021-01-25 and uses privacy-protected WHOIS plus Cloudflare nameservers. Traffic signals (Alexa ~65k, ~3 pageviews per visit, ~4.6 minutes on site) show real user activity from countries including Iran, the US and the UK. There are no Google Safe Browsing or crypto-blacklist matches, and no USPTO trademarks. Still, the site publishes no contact email or phone on the site, the WHOIS is private, and the site’s content category (movies/TV streaming) often attracts copyright and takedown risk — so avoid payments and verify before trusting the site. ⚠️
Risk Insights
No blacklist hits — but limited transparency
- Google Safe Browsing and crypto blacklist checks returned no threats.
- WHOIS privacy and missing site contact reduce traceability if problems arise.
- Good sign technically, but not sufficient to trust for payments.
Real traffic, content risk remains
- Alexa ~65k and multi-minute sessions suggest genuine visitors.
- Category (streaming/downloads) often exposes users to copyright or malware risks.
- Avoid paying for downloads or ‘unlock’ offers on such sites.
Contradictory Signals
The site behaves like an active service but lacks the transparency expected for a legitimate business that accepts payments.
Signal A: Traffic metrics indicate real engagement (Alexa rank, session length).
Signal B: WHOIS privacy and no contact email make operator hard to verify.
Category Scores
Red Flags & Warnings
- WHOIS is privacy‑protected with no public registrant contact, which reduces traceability.
- No site-exposed email or phone; only social links — harder to escalate problems or verify ownership.
- Category content (movie/TV downloads/streams) commonly hosts infringing material and can distribute malware via download links.
- SimilarWeb snapshot shows visits then a zero value in latest snapshot, which could indicate measurement gaps or intermittent availability.
🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis
WHOIS & domain age
Score: 70/100
WHOIS & domain age
"Registration in 2021 (expires 2026) suggests the domain is not brand-new, but the registrant uses a privacy service which reduces operator transparency."
Reason: Domain registered on 2021-01-25 and not newly created, which is a positive signal for persistence.
Technical infrastructure
Score: 70/100
Technical infrastructure
"Cloudflare nameservers are present (jill/graham) which is common and indicates a basic level of infrastructure; absence of SSL entries in the provided extract means you should still check the live site for a valid TLS certificate."
Reason: Uses Cloudflare nameservers and shows normal DNS A-record; no TLS warnings reported in evidence.
Traffic & engagement
Score: 65/100
Traffic & engagement
"SimilarWeb shows several hundred visits per month in mid‑2025, though a zero snapshot in Aug 2025 suggests intermittent measurement or downtime; visitor geography includes Iran, US, UK."
Reason: Alexa rank ~65k, ~3 pageviews/visitor and high session length indicate real engagement rather than a parked or empty domain.
Ownership & contact transparency
Score: 30/100
Ownership & contact transparency
"Social media profiles exist but without verifiable business contact info on the site; this reduces ability to escalate complaints or verify identity."
Reason: No email or phone on site and WHOIS uses a privacy service; contacting the operator may be difficult.
Blacklist & malware checks
Score: 75/100
Blacklist & malware checks
"Absence of blacklist flags lowers immediate fraud/malware suspicion, but lack of matches does not guarantee safety — check links and downloads carefully."
Reason: No matches found in Google Safe Browsing and crypto scam scanner shows not blacklisted.
Trademark & brand impersonation
Score: 80/100
Trademark & brand impersonation
"No USPTO hits reduce legal impersonation concerns in the US, but brand conflicts can still exist outside USPTO records and for similar domain names."
Reason: No USPTO trademark records for 'liltv.me' were found in the search.
Third‑party reputation signals
Score: 50/100
Third‑party reputation signals
"Scam tracking sources note a medium trust score (not outright flagged), so the site sits in a neutral-to-caution area; look for up-to-date user reviews."
Reason: Public safety checkers report medium trust scores; no strong positive reviews or large-scale complaints found.
Your Next Steps
-
1
Do not enter payment or personal financial details on this site until you verify the operator via an independent channel.
-
2
Check account/checkout pages for HTTPS and a valid TLS certificate before submitting data; prefer sites with clear contact email and address.
-
3
Search for recent user reviews (site name + “review”, “scam”, or “complaint”) and check major scam trackers and forum threads for recent reports.
-
4
If you see offers to pay for downloads or unlocks, treat them as high risk — avoid and consider using legal streaming services instead.
-
5
If you believe you encountered a scam or malware on the site, report the URL to Google Safe Browsing and to the registrar/abuse contact shown in WHOIS.
Evidence & Citations
-
SimilarWeb site analytics snapshot for liltv.me (Aug 2025)
SimilarWeb shows the site in arts_and_entertainment with estimated monthly visits around 425–475 in mid‑2025 and a zero value in the Aug 2025 snapshot; traffic sources reported as 'Direct' with little referral detail.
-
Website traffic stats (Alexa-like metrics) for liltv.me
Data shows Alexa rank ~65,519, ~3 pageviews per visitor, average session ~4:36, bounce rate ~28.9% and visitor countries: Iran (18.6%), US (15.6%), UK (8.7%).
-
Contact scrape for liltv.me (social profiles present, no emails)
Scraper found Facebook, Instagram and Twitter links but no email address or phone number on the site.
-
RDAP/WHOIS record for liltv.me
WHOIS shows registration date 2021-01-25, expiration 2026-01-25, nameservers on Cloudflare and registrant contact redacted (privacy service).
-
Quick reputation summary from searches and safety checkers
Search summaries indicate medium trust scores on public checkers (Scam Detector/ScamAdviser) and no large-scale reports of users losing money, but recommend caution.
-
Google Safe Browsing / blacklist checks
No matched threats found in the Google Safe Browsing response and crypto scam scanner returned no blacklist entries.
🕵🏻 Keep investigating
Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!
Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentialsPhishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...
Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishingGiveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...
Read playbook →Community feedback
Not rated yet
0 reviews published
Leave a review
Reviews
No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.