WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Liltv.me

Report Date
October 7, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

Quick take: liltv.me is a small streaming/download site with modest real traffic and active social profiles, but several ordinary trust gaps that warrant caution. The domain was registered on 2021-01-25 and uses privacy-protected WHOIS plus Cloudflare nameservers. Traffic signals (Alexa ~65k, ~3 pageviews per visit, ~4.6 minutes on site) show real user activity from countries including Iran, the US and the UK. There are no Google Safe Browsing or crypto-blacklist matches, and no USPTO trademarks. Still, the site publishes no contact email or phone on the site, the WHOIS is private, and the site’s content category (movies/TV streaming) often attracts copyright and takedown risk — so avoid payments and verify before trusting the site. ⚠️

Confidence Score
50%

Risk Insights

🛡️

No blacklist hits — but limited transparency

  • Google Safe Browsing and crypto blacklist checks returned no threats.
  • WHOIS privacy and missing site contact reduce traceability if problems arise.
  • Good sign technically, but not sufficient to trust for payments.
⚠️

Real traffic, content risk remains

  • Alexa ~65k and multi-minute sessions suggest genuine visitors.
  • Category (streaming/downloads) often exposes users to copyright or malware risks.
  • Avoid paying for downloads or ‘unlock’ offers on such sites.

Contradictory Signals

The site behaves like an active service but lacks the transparency expected for a legitimate business that accepts payments.

Signal A: Traffic metrics indicate real engagement (Alexa rank, session length).

Signal B: WHOIS privacy and no contact email make operator hard to verify.

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • WHOIS is privacy‑protected with no public registrant contact, which reduces traceability.
  • No site-exposed email or phone; only social links — harder to escalate problems or verify ownership.
  • Category content (movie/TV downloads/streams) commonly hosts infringing material and can distribute malware via download links.
  • SimilarWeb snapshot shows visits then a zero value in latest snapshot, which could indicate measurement gaps or intermittent availability.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

WHOIS & domain age

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Registration in 2021 (expires 2026) suggests the domain is not brand-new, but the registrant uses a privacy service which reduces operator transparency."

Reason: Domain registered on 2021-01-25 and not newly created, which is a positive signal for persistence.

Technical infrastructure

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Cloudflare nameservers are present (jill/graham) which is common and indicates a basic level of infrastructure; absence of SSL entries in the provided extract means you should still check the live site for a valid TLS certificate."

Reason: Uses Cloudflare nameservers and shows normal DNS A-record; no TLS warnings reported in evidence.

Traffic & engagement

Score: 65/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb shows several hundred visits per month in mid‑2025, though a zero snapshot in Aug 2025 suggests intermittent measurement or downtime; visitor geography includes Iran, US, UK."

Reason: Alexa rank ~65k, ~3 pageviews/visitor and high session length indicate real engagement rather than a parked or empty domain.

Ownership & contact transparency

Score: 30/100
Failed

"Social media profiles exist but without verifiable business contact info on the site; this reduces ability to escalate complaints or verify identity."

Reason: No email or phone on site and WHOIS uses a privacy service; contacting the operator may be difficult.

Blacklist & malware checks

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Absence of blacklist flags lowers immediate fraud/malware suspicion, but lack of matches does not guarantee safety — check links and downloads carefully."

Reason: No matches found in Google Safe Browsing and crypto scam scanner shows not blacklisted.

Trademark & brand impersonation

Score: 80/100
Passed

"No USPTO hits reduce legal impersonation concerns in the US, but brand conflicts can still exist outside USPTO records and for similar domain names."

Reason: No USPTO trademark records for 'liltv.me' were found in the search.

Third‑party reputation signals

Score: 50/100
Failed

"Scam tracking sources note a medium trust score (not outright flagged), so the site sits in a neutral-to-caution area; look for up-to-date user reviews."

Reason: Public safety checkers report medium trust scores; no strong positive reviews or large-scale complaints found.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Do not enter payment or personal financial details on this site until you verify the operator via an independent channel.

  • 2

    Check account/checkout pages for HTTPS and a valid TLS certificate before submitting data; prefer sites with clear contact email and address.

  • 3

    Search for recent user reviews (site name + “review”, “scam”, or “complaint”) and check major scam trackers and forum threads for recent reports.

  • 4

    If you see offers to pay for downloads or unlocks, treat them as high risk — avoid and consider using legal streaming services instead.

  • 5

    If you believe you encountered a scam or malware on the site, report the URL to Google Safe Browsing and to the registrar/abuse contact shown in WHOIS.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.