WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Justplay.lol

Report Date
October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

Verdict: ⚠️ Suspicious — justplay.lol shows several legitimate signals (USPTO trademark, press coverage, and social profiles) but also clear trust gaps: the public site reports effectively zero traffic, there are no scraped contact emails, and user reviews repeatedly complain about inconsistent payouts and poor support. No blacklist or Google Safe Browsing hits were found, so there’s no evidence of active phishing or malware. Treat the service with caution: it appears operational and legally registered, but users report reliability and payout issues that raise moderate risk for high-value interactions.

Confidence Score
65%

Risk Insights

🛡️

Trademarked brand but low site traction

  • USPTO shows a live trademark for JUSTPLAY.LOL LTD, supporting ownership.
  • SimilarWeb reports virtually no visits on the domain snapshot.
  • Low public traffic can hide problems and reduces independent verification signals.

Contradictory Signals

Legal and media signals indicate a real business, but weak public usage and user complaints create uncertainty about operational reliability.

Signal A: USPTO trademark and press coverage (supports legitimacy)

Signal B: Zero measured site traffic and multiple payout complaints (raises trust concerns)

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Zero or near-zero measured site traffic from SimilarWeb reduces public trust and suggests the site has limited independent usage.
  • No site-scraped contact emails or phone numbers; only social links were found, which complicates direct verification and support escalation.
  • Multiple user reports and review-site threads complain about inconsistent payouts, difficulty cashing out, and poor customer service.
  • WHOIS/DNS evidence lacked a clear SSL certificate record in the provided data, which merits checking the live site for proper HTTPS and certificate validity.
  • Brand-name overlap in local Google Places results can mislead users searching for corporate locations or reviews.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Identity

Score: 70/100
Passed

"A live USPTO entry lists JUSTPLAY.LOL LTD and an owner address in Ramat Gan, which supports that the brand has a formal registrant. Social accounts and a LinkedIn company page further corroborate identity, though corporate filings beyond the trademark were not provided in the evidence set."

Reason: Trademark record and company name appear in USPTO data and a LinkedIn company page exists.

Reputation

Score: 55/100
Failed

"Multiple independent reviews and complaint threads say payouts happen but are often small, inconsistent, or delayed; some users report successful cash-outs while others report unresolved disputes. This pattern suggests reputational risk rather than clear fraud."

Reason: Mixed online reviews: the app/site pays some users but many report payout inconsistencies and poor support.

Technical

Score: 60/100
Passed

"DNS entries show standard infrastructure (AWS nameservers and Outlook MX). Webflow proxy TXT indicates a managed site deployment. The evidence set did not return SSL certificate details, so confirm HTTPS and certificate validity on the live site before trusting secure operations."

Reason: DNS/MX records and managed hosting (AWS Route53, Webflow proxy) are present; no blacklist or Safe Browsing flags.

Content

Score: 50/100
Failed

"Only social links and company pages were found; no public support email or phone was scraped. Combined with near-zero traffic metrics, this lowers content-based trust because independent corroboration (press, reviews, community discussion) is limited on the domain itself."

Reason: Site and scraped pages lack direct contact emails and have low measured traffic, reducing transparency.

Legal

Score: 80/100
Passed

"A registered/tracked trademark record with ownership details strengthens legal standing. No public legal actions or regulatory flags were found in the searched time window."

Reason: USPTO trademark record exists and is marked live for JUSTPLAY.LOL LTD.

Business Validity

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Press coverage and app-related write-ups show the brand/product exists and has attracted industry attention. That supports business validity, though operational reliability (customer service, payouts) appears inconsistent in user reports."

Reason: Industry press mentions and app-store presence indicate active business operations, but user complaints about payout reliability reduce confidence.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Do not provide payment or sensitive financial information to the site or app unless you verify a secure payout path and clear support channels.

  • 2

    If you plan to use the service, test with minimal time and value: earn a small payout and confirm the cash-out process before investing more time.

  • 3

    Contact the company through the LinkedIn profile and social pages listed, and request documented payout policy and support response times.

  • 4

    Search for recent user complaints on Trustpilot, PissedConsumer, Reddit, and app-store reviews to assess current payout reliability.

  • 5

    If you suspect withheld payments after following support steps, file complaints with the app store (Google Play / Apple App Store) and consider a chargeback or consumer protection report if funds are at stake.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.