WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Iboiptv.com

Report Date
October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Β  Why we think so?Β 

Summary: iboiptv.com shows legitimate technical signals but noteworthy trust concerns. The domain was registered on 2020-10-09 and receives substantial traffic (SimilarWeb ~233k visits/month as of Sep 2025). The site uses Cloudflare, Google Analytics, and serves HTTPS with a valid cert (issued 2025-09-08). At the same time the WHOIS record is privacy-masked (Perfect Privacy) and multiple user reviews for the related "IBO Player" app allege billing and refund problems. Google Safe Browsing and a crypto-scam check returned clean results, and there are no USPTO trademark conflicts found in the supplied evidence. Overall: operational and active, but proceed with caution due to privacy-masked registration and direct user complaints about the app/service.

Confidence Score
53%

Risk Insights

πŸ›‘οΈ

Technical footprint is strong

  • Cloudflare CDN and valid TLS reduce obvious hosting/phishing risk.
  • Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicate standard measurement tools.
  • High monthly traffic (~233k) implies a functioning service with real users.
⚠️

Ownership and reputation concerns

  • WHOIS is privacy-masked via Perfect Privacy β€” ownership not transparent.
  • User complaints about the associated app report billing/refund problems.
  • No Safe Browsing hits, but user reports and masked WHOIS lower trust.

Contradictory Signals

The site appears operational and popular, yet direct user feedback and opaque ownership point toward service or business-practice problems rather than simple technical fraud.

Signal A: High traffic and solid tech stack (Cloudflare, valid SSL).

Signal B: User complaints about billing and privacy-masked WHOIS.

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Privacy-masked WHOIS (Perfect Privacy) β€” ownership not publicly transparent.
  • Multiple user complaints about billing/refunds tied to the IBO Player app; reports describe lost access after payment.
  • IPTV market risk: many IPTV providers can be tied to unlicensed content or sudden shutdowns, which raises legal/service risk for users.

πŸ”Ž Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & registration

Score: 70/100
Passed

"iboiptv.com was first registered 2020-10-09 and shows updates in 2023; multi-year registration suggests continuity, though longevity alone doesn't prove legitimacy."

Reason: Domain registered in October 2020 (multi-year presence is a positive signal).

WHOIS transparency

Score: 30/100
Failed

"Registrant fields show PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC and privacy service addresses rather than a named company or individual; this reduces traceability for disputes or refunds."

Reason: WHOIS is privacy-masked (Perfect Privacy) which obscures owner identity.

TLS / SSL certificate

Score: 85/100
Passed

"SSL appears valid and uses modern signature algorithm (ecdsa-with-SHA256); the site serves over HTTPS which protects data-in-transit."

Reason: Valid SSL certificate present (issued 2025-09-08, currently valid).

Hosting / CDN & tech stack

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Cloudflare presence and Ruby on Rails server framework plus Google services suggest a maintained, scalable setup rather than a throwaway landing page."

Reason: Uses Cloudflare CDN and common analytics (Google Analytics) indicating professional hosting and traffic handling.

Traffic & engagement

Score: 75/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb shows growing monthly visits (178k→213k→233k across three months), with top country shares concentrated in Brazil, Uruguay and Morocco — consistent, repeat usage from several countries."

Reason: High monthly visits (~232,829) and engagement (3.7 pages/visit; ~191s average session).

Blacklist / phishing scans

Score: 90/100
Passed

"The provided scans returned no matched threats; this reduces immediate technical suspicion but does not guarantee business legitimacy."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing and no crypto-scam blacklist flags in supplied evidence.

User reviews & reputation

Score: 40/100
Failed

"Apple App Store and Mac Informer user comments allege bait-and-switch billing and poor customer support; these are user reports (not court findings) but they are consistent enough to warrant caution."

Reason: Direct user complaints exist describing billing and refund problems for the related IBO Player app.

Contact information & social presence

Score: 60/100
Passed

"Evidence shows jane.doe@iboiptv.com and social links (Facebook group, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn). The absence of a public phone number or verified location weakens trust for refund/dispute channels."

Reason: Corporate-style email and multiple social profiles are present but lack phone or verified physical address.

Trademark / brand conflicts

Score: 70/100
Passed

"A lack of registered trademark is not proof of illegitimacy, but it means fewer legal protections for the brand and possibly more risk around impersonation or generic use."

Reason: No USPTO trademarks found for the queried term, so no direct trademark conflicts surfaced in the supplied search.

Legal / takedown history

Score: 50/100
Passed

"The IPTV industry has many enforcement actions, but no specific lawsuits or major takedown notices for iboiptv.com were present in the results; absence of evidence is not evidence of compliance."

Reason: No public legal cases or major takedowns for iboiptv.com found in the supplied evidence.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Avoid paying or sharing payment details until you confirm refund policy and ownership; test with the free trial only if available.

  • 2

    Contact the provider via the listed corporate-format email (jane.doe@iboiptv.com) and request a written refund policy and proof of licensed content.

  • 3

    Search for recent, independent user reviews referencing refunds or billing (Apple App Store, Mac Informer) and prioritize those with dates and transaction details.

  • 4

    If you paid and suspect fraud, file a complaint with your payment provider and preserve receipts, timestamps and correspondence.

  • 5

    Check for legal risk: verify whether the service lists licenses for the channels/content it provides and avoid using services that cannot document licensing.

Evidence & Citations

πŸ•΅πŸ» Keep investigating

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.