WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Fisherinvestments.com

Report Date October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Fisher Investments (fisherinvestments.com) is an established U.S. investment adviser with heavy traffic (~3M monthly visits), a long domain history (registered ~1999), and enterprise-grade infrastructure (Akamai CDN, DigiCert TLS). These are strong trust signals. However, the company appears in multiple customer complaints, arbitration and lawsuit records, and—crucially—has been widely impersonated by clone sites (regulators have issued warnings). Verdict: legitimate organization but exercise caution and verify contact details before transferring money. 🛡️

Confidence Score
81%

Risk Insights

🛡️

Legitimate brand, impersonation risk

Fisher Investments is a large, long-running financial adviser (domain ~1999, high traffic).
Regulators have warned about clone sites that impersonate the firm; impersonation is the primary immediate risk.
Always verify contact details and certificate before sending funds or personal data.
✅

Technical hygiene is strong

Akamai CDN/DNS, DigiCert TLS and multiple TXT verification records indicate good domain controls.
No Google Safe Browsing or crypto-blacklist detections for the official domain.

Contradictory Signals

Technically and operationally the site looks legitimate, but legal disputes and customer complaints reduce trust and require caution.

Signal A: High traffic and enterprise infrastructure (positive authenticity signal)

Signal B: Multiple lawsuits and numerous low-location reviews (negative reputation signal)

Category Scores

Identity 88/100
Reputation 66/100
Technical 92/100
Content 82/100
Legal 58/100
Business Validity 80/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple legal claims and BBB complaints alleging mismanagement, fee disputes and arbitration cases — some remain active.
  • Documented clone/impersonation scams targeting Fisher Investments clients; regulators (e.g., FCA) have issued warnings about lookalike sites.
  • Mixed Google Places ratings (several locations show low average ratings), indicating notable customer dissatisfaction at some branches.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain technical footprint (CDN, DNS, TLS)

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Akamai CDN/DNS entries and DigiCert certificate (valid through 2026-01-18) suggest strong operational security."

Reason: Enterprise-grade CDN (Akamai) and DigiCert TLS reflect a professionally maintained domain.

Traffic & engagement (SimilarWeb)

Score: 88/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb reports 2.6–3.0M monthly visits in mid-2025 and global rank ~24k, indicating heavy organic interest and brand reach."

Reason: High monthly visits (~3M) and majority US audience (≈71%) show consistent, genuine site usage.

WHOIS / registrar / domain age

Score: 92/100
Passed

"Creation epoch (≈1999) and CSC registration are consistent with a longstanding corporate-owned domain and professional controls."

Reason: Registrar is CSC Corporate Domains and creation timestamp corresponds to late 1990s — long-established registration.

Contact details & social presence

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Site-level contact pages list multiple numbers and social links (Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram); use these to verify unsolicited outreach."

Reason: Published phone numbers and official social profiles are present; phone listed (888-823-9566) matches Google Places.

Blacklist / Safe Browsing checks

Score: 100/100
Passed

"Google Safe Browsing returned no matched threats and crypto scam sniffer shows clean — low technical risk for malware/phishing on the official domain."

Reason: No Google Safe Browsing hits; crypto scam scanner shows domain not blacklisted.

Trademark / USPTO conflicts

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Search returned zero direct USPTO results for the query; trademarks often exist under corporate names rather than domain strings."

Reason: No confusing USPTO trademark records for the exact query; lowers risk of brand hijack via trademark conflict.

Legal history & customer complaints

Score: 50/100
Failed

"Documented disputes include arbitration claims (e.g., multi-million-dollar allegations), a 2020 elder-abuse suit settled in arbitration, and ongoing filings; these affect trust/reputation even if not criminal fraud."

Reason: Multiple lawsuits, arbitration claims and BBB complaints allege mismanagement, fees or elder abuse in some cases.

Local listings & user reviews (Google Places)

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Multiple US locations appear, with varied ratings (several locations show low averages like 2.2–2.6), indicating inconsistent local customer experience."

Reason: Google Places includes official Fisher Investments locations, but ratings vary (some locations with low averages).

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Verify you are on the official domain (https://www.fisherinvestments.com) and check the TLS certificate before sharing account details.
  • 2
    Call a published phone number from the official site (e.g., 888-823-9566) rather than numbers in unsolicited messages.
  • 3
    If contacted by someone claiming to be Fisher, compare the email address/phone against the company’s contact page and look for corporate domains (no generic Gmail/Hotmail addresses).
  • 4
    Search regulator warnings (FCA, SEC) and use Google Safe Browsing / WHOIS if you suspect an impersonator.
  • 5
    For disputes or suspected mismanagement, document communications and consult a securities attorney or file a complaint with state regulators and FINRA if applicable.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →