WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Fetish.com

Report Date
October 7, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

⚠️ Fetish.com appears to be a long‑running adult dating/community site with real traffic and standard infrastructure (Cloudflare, HTTPS, PayPal/Stripe). That said, user reports note fake profiles, subscription cancellation difficulties, and mixed reviews — so treat it with caution and avoid sending money or sharing sensitive documents.

Confidence Score
70%

Risk Insights

🛡️

High traffic, older domain

  • ≈718k monthly visits and registration dating to 1995 suggest an established platform.
  • High pages/visit (~7) implies engaged users rather than transient click-farms.
⚠️

User complaints about cancellations & fake profiles

  • Aggregated reviews report fake/bot accounts and difficulty cancelling subscriptions.
  • These issues pose financial risk even when the operator is legitimate.

Contradictory Signals

Technically legitimate infrastructure and scale conflict with practical consumer complaints; that yields a cautious verdict.

Signal A: High traffic + mainstream payments + long domain age (signals of legitimacy)

Signal B: Multiple user complaints about fake profiles and billing (signals of poor user experience and potential monetization risks)

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • User complaints about fake profiles/bots and reports of difficulty cancelling memberships could lead to wasted payments.
  • Mixed review/trust scores in third‑party sites — not outright scam listings but enough complaints to reduce confidence.
  • Some contact details and registrant email look routed through third‑party addresses (registrant email: info@konzert.de), which may complicate accountability.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & WHOIS

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Older domains with a registrant are usually more stable; WHOIS lists Ideawise Limited and a Hong Kong contact, which is consistent with an operating business."

Reason: Domain is long‑established (registered 1995) with a visible registrant organization, which reduces the likelihood of a throwaway scam.

Traffic volume & engagement (SimilarWeb)

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Traffic concentrated in the UK and US; stable monthly visit estimates across recent months support continuity rather than a transient scam campaign."

Reason: High monthly visits (~718k) and strong pages/visit (~7) point to a real, active user base and consistent site usage.

Technology & infrastructure (SimilarTech)

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Presence of Cloudflare, HTTPS and bot management reduces technical risk from obvious compromises or takeovers."

Reason: Site runs standard tech (Cloudflare, HTTPS, analytics, bot management) and supports mainstream payment processors — a technically mature setup.

Payments & monetization

Score: 78/100
Passed

"Mainstream processors imply business legitimacy, though they do not guarantee good customer service or absence of fake profiles."

Reason: Multiple known payment providers (PayPal, Stripe, card networks) are integrated, giving users dispute options if charges are problematic.

Contact details & support

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Public support emails are a positive signal, but response quality and speed should be tested by contacting support directly."

Reason: Site lists support and data protection emails plus social accounts, which facilitates user communication and takedown requests.

Reputation & user reports

Score: 45/100
Failed

"Multiple complaint types (fake profiles, cancellation difficulty) were surfaced by review aggregators — these are practical risks for paying users."

Reason: Third‑party reviews and aggregated search results report fake/bot profiles and cancellation issues, lowering trust.

Blacklist / phishing status

Score: 90/100
Passed

"No active phishing/malware flags were found in the scanned lists at time of check."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing and crypto scam checks returned clean results.

Trademark conflicts (USPTO)

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Absence of USPTO entries doesn't guarantee no global trademark issues, but no direct US trademark conflict was detected."

Reason: No matching USPTO trademarks were found for the exact query, reducing immediate brand‑infringement concerns in US filings.

Local business listings / maps

Score: 40/100
Failed

"For consumer trust, a verifiable business address or maps listing helps; fetish.com shows registrant address in WHOIS but no formal Google Places entry."

Reason: No Google Places / Maps physical listing found, which is typical for online-only communities but reduces traceable local presence.

News and third‑party coverage

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Press coverage is mostly neutral or directory‑style; coverage does not allege large‑scale fraud but includes context about risks on adult platforms generally."

Reason: Site appears in mainstream lists and articles about BDSM dating sites, which supports legitimacy and public recognition.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    Do not make large or irreversible payments before verifying — prefer PayPal/credit card so you can dispute charges if needed.

  • 2

    Verify account and membership cancellation terms; test cancellation on a small purchase to confirm process.

  • 3

    Check support@fetish.com for a response time and save all receipts and correspondence for disputes.

  • 4

    Avoid sharing personal ID, bank details, or sexually explicit materials that could be used for extortion.

  • 5

    If you see suspicious profiles or potential scams on the site, report them through the site’s contact email and keep screenshots.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.