WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Faire.com

Report Date
October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

Faire (faire.com) is a large, established wholesale marketplace with multi‑million monthly visits and enterprise infrastructure (AWS, Cloudflare, Stripe integrations). ✅ The site shows many technical trust signals: valid SSL, many domain verification TXT records, official social profiles, and broad press coverage. ⚠️ However, independent user reports and BBB/perplexity summaries show recurring complaints about account suspensions, disputed charges, shipping/duty issues, and uneven customer support — plus recent high‑profile litigation (resolved in Faire’s favor). Bottom line: platform appears legitimate but carries operational/financial risk for some sellers and buyers, so proceed with caution.

Confidence Score
75%

Risk Insights

🛡️

Large, technically robust marketplace

  • About 5.9M monthly visits and strong engagement metrics suggest real, regular usage.
  • Uses AWS, Cloudflare, Stripe and multiple verification TXT records — enterprise architecture.
  • No active blacklist or malware flags observed.
⚠️

Operational risk from user complaints

  • Repeated reports of account suspensions, disputed charges, and customs fees appear in BBB and user writeups.
  • Complaints affect sellers and buyers differently — vendors risk lost inventory; buyers report billing and duty surprises.

Contradictory Signals

Technical and scale signals point to a legitimate platform, but operational complaints create real financial risk for some users — treat the site as legitimate but operationally risky.

Signal A: High traffic, enterprise hosting, and many domain verifications (positive trust signals).

Signal B: Numerous user complaints about money lost, account suspensions, and disputed charges (operational risk).

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user reports of account suspensions and unrecovered inventory, which led some sellers to report financial loss and poor support resolution.
  • Complaints about unexpected/customs charges and unauthorized billing practices that some users describe as effectively losing money on orders.
  • WHOIS shows registrant privacy (Identity Protection Service), which reduces transparency about the listed registrant organization.
  • Past high‑profile litigation (Tundra v. Faire) and many customer complaints to consumer bodies (BBB), increasing reputational friction for users to navigate.
  • Some user reviews allege unresolved chargebacks and slow/templated customer responses, which raises operational risk for financial disputes.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age and registrar

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Long registration date (1998) and Amazon Registrar listing support continuity; low risk from age/registrar vector."

Reason: Domain registered in 1998 and maintained under a reputable registrar, indicating long‑standing operation.

WHOIS transparency

Score: 45/100
Failed

"Privacy services are common for corporations, but they make ownership verification harder for third parties and raise a minor caution flag."

Reason: Registrant details are masked by an identity protection service, reducing direct transparency about the owner.

Technical security and infrastructure

Score: 92/100
Passed

"Multiple TXT records for Google, Stripe, HubSpot, and other providers plus valid SSL and reputable DNS point to active security and domain control."

Reason: Site uses enterprise hosting (AWS), CDN (Cloudflare), valid SSL, and standard email/SPF/TXT verifications.

Blacklist / phishing checks

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Automated threat sources show no active flags for malware/phishing; still monitor over time for new reports."

Reason: No matches in Google Safe Browsing and no crypto‑scam blacklist matches.

Traffic, popularity and usage signals

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Traffic and engagement metrics are consistent with a broadly used B2B marketplace serving many retailers."

Reason: High monthly visits, low bounce, and long time on site indicate real user engagement.

Reputation and user complaints

Score: 60/100
Failed

"Patterns in complaints (suspensions, charge disputes, customs fees) are operational concerns that have persisted in public reporting."

Reason: Significant numbers of complaints to BBB and independent writeups describing unresolved financial disputes and account issues.

News & public records

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Business Wire, Bloomberg, Reuters, and Forbes coverage supports that Faire is an established marketplace with outside investment."

Reason: Coverage in reputable outlets and corporate press releases indicates legitimate business operations and investor interest.

Trademark conflicts (USPTO)

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Empty USPTO result set reduces risk of active trademark dispute on the exact query, though brand trademarks may exist under related terms."

Reason: No USPTO matches for 'faire.com' in quick search; no immediate trademark conflict found.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    If you plan to buy or sell, test with a small transaction first and use a payment method that offers buyer/seller protection.

  • 2

    Search recent BBB and forum complaints for the specific use case (seller payouts, account suspensions, customs fees) before committing large inventory or funds.

  • 3

    Document and retain all order confirmations, shipping receipts, and support correspondence in case you need dispute evidence.

  • 4

    Consider contacting Faire support for a pre‑sale policy clarification (returns, disputed charges, duty handling) and keep proof of their written responses.

  • 5

    If you’re a vendor, avoid shipping high‑value inventory until payment terms and account stability are confirmed; maintain parallel sales channels.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.