WebVetted
+ New
Site icon

Domain Due Diligence

Report for Cnfans.com

Report Date
October 7, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
  Why we think so? 

Fast scan summary: CNFans is a high-traffic shopping/agent site (about 5.7 million monthly visits) with a professional tech stack (Cloudflare + Alibaba Cloud, valid SSL) and public contact channels (email and social accounts). However, there are numerous independent user reports describing cancelled orders, stuck refunds, surprise fees and missing items — a consistent pattern that raises serious trust concerns. Technical signals and traffic suggest a real, active operation, but reputation signals point to repeated customer disputes. Verdict: ⚠️ Suspicious — proceed with caution, use buyer protection and start with small orders.

Confidence Score
53%

Risk Insights

⚠️

High traffic but poor reputation

  • Site sees ~5.7M monthly visits, so many buyers are exposed to its practices.
  • Multiple independent complaints report payment/refund failures and missing items.
  • High traffic + repeated complaints increases the risk to buyers, especially for big orders.
🛡️

Strong technical posture

  • Uses Cloudflare and Alibaba Cloud with a valid SSL certificate.
  • Not listed on Google Safe Browsing or major crypto scam blacklists.
  • Technical signals reduce malware/phishing concerns but do not fix operational fraud risks.

Contradictory Signals

The site looks like an established, technically well-run merchant, but reputation evidence suggests it may be failing at order fulfillment and customer service — a contradiction between infrastructure and customer experience.

Signal A: High technical quality and large stable traffic

Signal B: Consistent user reports of non-delivery, refund failures and review manipulation

Category Scores

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user reports of payments without delivery, stalled refunds and surprise fees (consistent across videos and complaint forums).
  • Allegations of manipulated or fake reviews which can hide negative experiences and mislead buyers.
  • WHOIS registrant details are not fully transparent (registrant field missing), reducing traceability.
  • High direct traffic share may indicate aggressive marketing or resold traffic sources that obscure source quality.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Identity (WHOIS & contact transparency)

Score: 55/100
Failed

"WHOIS shows registrar Alibaba Cloud and name servers on Cloudflare, but registrant fields are not populated with a clear company name or address; that makes ownership harder to verify quickly."

Reason: Domain is registered (2018) but public registrant fields are minimal; lack of clear corporate contact weakens identity trust.

Reputation (reviews, complaints, social evidence)

Score: 30/100
Failed

"YouTube reviews, complaint forum threads and user reports consistently describe poor refund handling and missing items; while some users receive orders, the volume and consistency of negative reports are worrying."

Reason: Multiple independent complaints describing cancelled orders, stuck refunds, and unexpected fees point to systemic reputation problems.

Technical (hosting, SSL, blacklists)

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Reputable CDN and security providers are in use and the site is not listed on major technical blacklists, which reduces the chance it is a short-lived phishing or malware site."

Reason: Uses Cloudflare + Alibaba Cloud, valid SSL, and is not flagged by Google Safe Browsing — technical posture is strong.

Content & Service (product pages, transparency, policies)

Score: 60/100
Failed

"Product pages and help-center content exist, yet multiple buyers report that promised shipping and refund processes frequently fail in practice."

Reason: Site appears functional with product listings and policies, but user reports point to delivery and refund process failures that undermine service reliability.

Legal & Brand (trademarks, formal actions)

Score: 50/100
Passed

"We found no registered US trademark for 'cnfans.com' and no headline legal actions in the news or complaint searches; absence of legal action does not prove reliability but reduces immediate legal red flags."

Reason: No USPTO trademark matches and no clear public record of lawsuits in the examined sources.

Business validity (shipping partners, payment brands)

Score: 45/100
Failed

"The site lists carriers and payment brands and shows real traffic, but customer reports about fulfillment and refunds undermine practical trust in its operations."

Reason: Integrations with known payment and shipping brands exist, which suggests a real merchant, but repeated operational complaints reduce confidence in business practices.

Your Next Steps

  • 1

    If you must buy, place a single, low-value order first to test fulfillment and customer service.

  • 2

    Pay with a method that offers buyer protection (credit card, PayPal) so you can dispute charges if necessary.

  • 3

    Save receipts, screenshots and message threads; request refunds in writing and note ticket IDs for any disputes.

  • 4

    Check recent user reviews on multiple platforms (YouTube reviews, Trustpilot, complaint sites) before large purchases.

  • 5

    Report unresolved fraud to your payment provider and local consumer protection authorities if you lose money.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended → 🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

 Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook → Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →

Community feedback

Not rated yet

0 reviews published

5 stars 0%
4 stars 0%
3 stars 0%
2 stars 0%
1 star 0%

Leave a review

Reviews

No public reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.