Logo

Jsdelivr.net 360° Intelligence

Report Date: Jun 5, 2026
Risk Level: Moderate
Vet New Site

Executive Summary

Global Rank

#-

Monthly Visits

~1.46M

Avg Duration

1m 46s

Pages/Visit

2.16

Strategic Overview

Business Moats

Long-lived domain with a 2012 registration date., Developer-focused CDN utility that is embedded in software workflows., Large direct traffic share suggests habitual usage and brand familiarity., No Safe Browsing or crypto blacklist hits on the domain itself..

Market Headwinds

Security researchers have documented phishing and trojanized-package abuse involving jsDelivr delivery paths., The domain is hard to map to a corporate entity from public contact and LinkedIn data., Traffic is concentrated in direct referrals, which can be sticky but also makes acquisition less transparent., Public perception may be affected by association with malicious package delivery, even if the service is not itself malicious..

Our Verdict

Business Quality Good
Reputation Moderate
Domain / Ownership Good
Security / Abuse Exposure Bad

Upside & Downside Analysis

The Bull Case

3 Points
🛠️

Developer utility is real

  • The site serves a core infrastructure role for developers.
  • Monthly visits are around 1.46M, which supports broad usage.
  • Direct traffic is about 71.5%, suggesting repeat access and brand recall.
🏛️

Established domain footprint

  • The domain was created on 2012-05-16.
  • WHOIS shows registry lock status (`clienttransferprohibited`).
  • A long operating history usually lowers the chance of a disposable or throwaway operation.
🛡️

No direct blacklist signal

  • Google Safe Browsing returned no detected risk.
  • The crypto scam sniffer did not blacklist the domain.
  • There is no public Google Places profile, which fits an infrastructure business rather than a local storefront.

The Bear Case

3 Points
⚠️

Security abuse is a real externality

  • Security news links jsDelivr to phishing and trojanized package distribution.
  • That creates reputational drag, even if the platform is only the delivery layer.
  • Attackers can exploit the brand trust of a CDN to hide malicious payloads.
🔍

Sparse operating transparency

  • No public emails or social accounts were found by the contact scraper.
  • LinkedIn did not return a business profile for the domain.
  • The registrant is proxied, so ownership is intentionally obscured.
📉

Traffic quality is hard to underwrite

  • Bounce rate is about 56.2%, which is not especially strong for a utility site.
  • Average time on site is only about 107 seconds.
  • The top-country mix is fragmented across the US, China, India, Germany, and Russia.

Domain Integrity

The domain is old, locked, and uses multiple CDN-oriented name servers. Public records do not expose the operating company directly, but the infrastructure profile looks consistent with a global developer CDN.

Registrar Amazon Registrar, Inc.
Domain Age May 16, 2012 (14 years old)
Security Status
Registry Locked SSL: Valid

Reputation

0

0 Reviews

Trustpilot

Sentiment Analysis

There is no populated Trustpilot-style consumer review trail, which is normal for infrastructure software. The bigger reputation issue is security commentary: multiple third-party reports describe attackers using jsDelivr as free hosting or delivery infrastructure for phishing and trojanized packages.

Common Themes
No themes detected.

Traffic Distribution

Top Countries Traffic Share Trend
US
26.60%
CN
22.32%
IN
6.54%
DE
2.88%
RU
2.54%

Competition

Competitor Type Threat Analysis
CDN / edge delivery providers Large CDNs such as Cloudflare, Fastly, and Akamai can compete on speed, reliability, and enterprise trust.
Package and asset hosting services npm, GitHub, and other static asset hosts can absorb developer traffic if they are easier to trust or integrate.
Open-source mirror and distribution networks Alternative mirrors can win if developers want redundancy, lower latency, or tighter governance.

Tech Stack

🌐

DNS / multi-provider routing

The domain uses several name servers across NS1, ClouDNS, Gcore, and GCDN, which suggests a distributed DNS setup for resilience.

🔐

Domain security

WHOIS shows registry lock status and TXT verification records for Google and GlobalSign, indicating active domain control and verification.

🚚

Delivery infrastructure

The name server mix and public positioning point to CDN-style asset delivery rather than a traditional consumer web app.

Key Risks

Identified Risk Impact Mitigation
Third-party security incidents may continue to associate the brand with phishing and malware delivery. High Publish clearer abuse controls, takedown procedures, and security guidance for package consumers.
Public transparency is limited because ownership and contacts are proxied or absent. Medium Provide a clearer legal entity page, abuse contact, and trust documentation on the site.
Dependence on direct traffic and developer habit can mask underlying churn. Medium Track cohort retention, package adoption, and referral mix more closely than raw visit counts.
Attackers may keep using the service as a delivery layer for malicious assets. High Strengthen malware scanning, abuse monitoring, and rapid removal workflows.

Contacts

Department Points of Contact

No department contacts listed.

Social Presence

No social profiles found.

Appendix & Sources

Key Citations

Data Sources Used

SimilarWeb-style traffic evidence WHOIS / DNS / SSL lookup Google Safe Browsing USPTO trademark search Google News results Website contact scraping Crypto scam blacklist check LinkedIn domain lookup BuiltWith lookup

Disclaimer

This report is based on the supplied evidence set only. Traffic, reputation, and security references are external signals and may not reflect the current state of the service in real time.