Executive Summary
Global Rank
#287
Monthly Visits
72
Avg Duration
9m 5s
Pages/Visit
14.34
Strategic Overview
Very high direct traffic; strong brand recognition in niche., User-generated content at large volume., Lack of mainstream competitors focused on similar content..
Repeated, credible allegations of hosting illegal/abusive content., Severe reputation risk—public/media outcry and user complaints., Opaque ownership and organizational structure., Potential for legal action and payment platform bans., Weak infrastructure for content moderation and takedown..
Our Verdict
Upside & Downside Analysis
The Bull Case
2 PointsVery Strong Traffic & Audience Engagement
- Consistently attracts 70–72 million monthly visits; high pages/visit (14.34) and long average time-on-site (~9 min).
- Ranks above most adult niche competitors in traffic within its segment.
- Direct and search-based traffic indicate users actively seek the site’s offering.
Network Effects of User Content
- Large volume of user-uploaded content reduces acquisition costs and ensures rapidly updating catalog.
- Community element can increase platform stickiness.
The Bear Case
3 PointsSevere Legal & Regulatory Exposure
- Multiple reviews and news sources allege the hosting of illegal/prohibited material, including extreme and non-consensual content.
- Site lacks transparency about content moderation and owner identity.
- Major legal or regulatory action could abruptly shutter the business.
Extreme Brand and Reputational Damage
- Mainstream and user-facing platforms—Trustpilot, review aggregators, media—register frequent accusations of unsafe or criminal content.
- Blacklist by payment processors or ISPs has precedence in this space for similar sites.
Uninvestable Opacity
- No leadership, corporate, or jurisdictional disclosures.
- No legal US trademark or public-facing company registration.
- No way to directly assess governance or compliance practices.
Domain Integrity
Domain privately registered since 2011, using own nameservers and valid SSL; registrar is well known but entity is not publicly disclosed.
| Registrar | PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com |
|---|---|
| Domain Age | Feb 7, 2011 (14 years old) |
| Security Status |
Registry Locked
SSL: E8
|
Reputation
20 Reviews
Sentiment Analysis
Overwhelmingly negative external reputation, including allegations of illegal content, theft, and abusive moderation. Lacks visible official response.
Common Themes
Traffic Distribution
| Top Countries | Traffic Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|
|
United States
|
33.30% |
|
|
Japan
|
6.10% |
|
|
Germany
|
5.30% |
|
|
France
|
4.40% |
|
|
Canada
|
4.30% |
|
Competition
| Competitor Type | Threat Analysis |
|---|---|
| Mainstream Adult Video Platforms (e.g., Pornhub, Xvideos, Xhamster) | Robust compliance, content moderation, and higher advertiser/publisher acceptance. |
| Niche/Community-based Video Sites (e.g., MyVidster, Motherless, EroMe) | Direct content overlap; sometimes less strict governance gives competitive parity. |
| Third-party Copyright Holders | DMCA takedown pressure, risk of lawsuits, and clearance for hosted content. |
| Payment Processors/Infrastructure Providers | Deplatforming risk due to regulatory sanctions or media outcry. |
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
- Huge direct user base and sustained traffic.
- Frequent user engagement (long time-on-site, many pageviews).
- Niche dominance in amateur/extreme content.
Weaknesses
- No management transparency or legal entity disclosures.
- Extremely weak content moderation and compliance.
- High frequency of serious user complaints and negative reviews.
- Legacy code, technical glitches.
Opportunities
- Expansion into better-moderated or regionalized markets if compliance improves.
- Monetization via direct user payments if credit card access restored.
- Technical investment to reduce site downtime and improve user experience.
Threats
- Legal/jurisdictional action that could permanently ban or block the site.
- Content owner lawsuits and government investigations.
- Major infrastructure deplatforming (CDN, hosting, DNS).
- Loss of user trust due to repeated allegations of illegal activity.
Tech Stack
Hosting & CDN
Uses Cloudflare for CDN and DDoS protection; main server appears to be self-hosted on 88.208.57.223 (likely Europe-based), with nginx as the web server.
Web Tech & Security
Supports HTTPS, actively uses modern HTML5, Open Graph, reCAPTCHA, and security best practices at basic technical level.
Key Risks
| Identified Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting illegal, non-consensual, or otherwise prohibited content resulting in legal action or site takedown. | High | No visible, comprehensive mitigation; site appears to rely on user reporting and DMCA process. Lacks proactive moderation. |
| Regulatory action or ISP blacklisting in major markets (e.g., US, UK). | High | Geo-blocking (e.g., for UK users), high dependence on non-mainstream revenue sources. Limited jurisdictional disclosure. |
| Loss of payment or hosting infrastructure from deplatforming pressures. | High | Multi-provider approach (Cloudflare + direct), but no major public relationships to preserve stability. |
| Major reputational crises leading to user exodus or advertiser loss. | Medium | Content still draws significant traffic, but lack of mainstream advertising support is an ongoing constraint. |
| Copyright infringement liabilities due to stolen or unlicensed content. | High | Relies on DMCA takedowns; reactive not proactive. |
Contacts
Appendix & Sources
Key Citations
-
SimilarTech: thisvid.com Tech & Traffic
Provides technology stack and traffic rank.
-
SimilarWeb: thisvid.com Engagement & Country Data
Shows top countries, monthly visits, traffic sources, and global rank.
-
Trustpilot: thisvid.com Reviews
Details user reputation, content complaint themes, and user experience.
-
Whois.com info on thisvid.com
Domain history, registrar, DNS, and SSL certificate information.
-
US Trademark Search
No official US trademark found for thisvid.
-
Scamadviser Risk Review
External risk and reputation summary.
Data Sources Used
Disclaimer
This report is for informational purposes only. Due diligence findings are based on public or third-party sources as of the stated date and may change. No assertion is made about legal or regulatory compliance; professional legal advice should be obtained before investment.