Executive Summary
Global Rank
#~1.10M
Monthly Visits
27,786
Avg Duration
0m 19s
Pages/Visit
1.67
Strategic Overview
Long-standing domain authority, Diverse SEO toolkit with decades of continuous updates, Low fixed price point compared to subscription-based competitors.
Heavy competition from feature-rich, well-funded SaaS SEO platforms, Poor customer support reputation and strict no-refund policy, Limited transparency on leadership, operations, and funding.
Our Verdict
Upside & Downside Analysis
The Bull Case
2 PointsEstablished Brand with Proven Utility 🏆
- Over 15 years of domain and product history; trusted by a portion of the SEO community.
- Product endorsed by recognized marketers and widely known in technical SEO circles.
- Low one-time purchase cost with ongoing updates and addons gives strong value—for those comfortable with DIY support.
Global Digital Reach and Payment Flexibility 🌐
- Substantial direct and organic search traffic (>27,000 monthly visits) from US, India, Indonesia, and other global markets.
- Multiple payment acceptance mechanisms including PayPal, Visa, and historical Bitcoin support.
The Bear Case
2 PointsWeak Customer Support/After-Sales Risk 🚩
- Persistent complaints on Trustpilot, G2, and forums about absent support, denied license recovery, and a rigid no-refund policy.
- User loss of access or technical difficulties not well-resolved, leading to reputational drag and risk of churn.
Competitive and Regulatory Pressure 🏢
- Modern SEO users increasingly expect SaaS solutions—ScrapeBox’s model may appear outdated.
- Potential compliance risk if marketed or used for activities that violate platform or regional scraping rules.
Domain Integrity
Domain registered since 2009 with privacy protection; well-established, locked at registrar, SSL up to date, and no safe browsing warnings detected.
| Registrar | NAMECHEAP INC |
|---|---|
| Domain Age | Oct 7, 2009 (16 years old) |
| Security Status |
Registry Locked
SSL: R13
|
Reputation
17 Reviews
Sentiment Analysis
Reputation is divided: some users call it a best-in-class SEO tool, while others flag harsh support policies and personal friction with the owner.
Common Themes
Traffic Distribution
| Top Countries | Traffic Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|
|
Algeria
|
13.20% |
|
|
United States
|
12.74% |
|
|
India
|
10.90% |
|
|
Vietnam
|
8.57% |
|
|
Indonesia
|
6.25% |
|
Competition
| Competitor Type | Threat Analysis |
|---|---|
| SaaS SEO Platforms (e.g. Ahrefs, SEMrush, Moz) | Offer integrated, cloud-first solutions and customer support; appeal to businesses wanting managed, all-in-one SEO and analytics. |
| Free/Open Source SEO Scraping Tools | Target DIY or technical users with similar scraping functions at lower or no cost, eroding price advantage. |
| Specialized Data Scrapers | Newer, single-purpose web/data scrapers compete on UX or compliance, drawing users needing particular verticals or safety assurances. |
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
- Longstanding market presence and product continuity
- Simple, one-time purchase model
- Feature-rich toolset for advanced users
Weaknesses
- Headline customer support and owner complaints
- No VC backing; minimal business transparency
- Perceived as dated versus SaaS-first platforms
Opportunities
- Expand features for technical/legacy SEO user base
- Increase transparency or partnerships to boost trust
- Leverage historic brand to build learning resources
Threats
- Rising dominance of SaaS SEO suites
- Intensifying regulatory focus on scraping
- Ongoing reputational harm from negative reviews
Tech Stack
Web Hosting & Infrastructure
Hosted on dedicated IP; uses Namecheap DNS, with past evidence of US and offshore data center use.
Website Platform & Integrations
Runs on WordPress with multiple plugins (Contact Form 7, analytics, lightbox, Slack widget, etc.) and standard jQuery/JS stack.
Payments & Security
Accepts PayPal and Visa; supports HTTPS by default, with recent valid SSL; implemented SPF and DMARC email security.
Key Risks
| Identified Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Customer churn due to poor support or denied refunds/licenses | Medium | Clearly state refund/license policies upfront; maintain community and peer support channels. |
| Competitive pressure from modern SaaS SEO tools | High | Innovate niche features, maintain low pricing, serve legacy/technical users less targeted by SaaS incumbents. |
| Brand/reputation risk from negative reviews and founder personality | Medium | Consider external support partnerships or official policy improvements; proactively manage community engagement. |
| Potential for misuse in violation of TOS of target sites (scraping risk) | Medium | Emphasize compliant, white-hat use-cases; written policies against abusive scraping. |
Contacts
Appendix & Sources
Key Citations
-
SimilarWeb Traffic and Engagement Analytics
Provided authoritative traffic, geography, and bounce rate figures.
-
Trustpilot User Reviews
Reviews used to assess reputation—persistent split between supporters and critics.
-
WHOIS Record for scrapebox.com
Established registration date, registrar lock, and domain privacy verified.
-
BuiltWith Technology Profile: scrapebox.com
Evidence of technical stack, plugins, hosting, and security tech.
-
Perplexity Review Aggregator Results
Captured broad market sentiment and summarized review themes from G2, forums, and blogs.
-
ScrapeBox Official FAQ
Confirmed explicit no-refund policy and license terms.
Data Sources Used
Disclaimer
This report is for informational purposes only, based on public and third-party data as of 2026-02-22. Investors should conduct further independent research to verify all findings. Risk assessments may change as new information emerges.