Logo

Rimac.com 360° Intelligence

Report Date: Nov 25, 2025
Risk Level Moderate

Executive Summary

Global Rank

#70,315

Monthly Visits

602,867

Avg Duration

5m 9s

Pages/Visit

4.76

Strategic Overview

Economic Moats

Strong local market presence in Peru (≈97% of traffic) and high monthly audience., Enterprise-level technology stack and CDN/edge footprint for resilience and performance., Established payment flows (Visa/Amex/Mastercard) and observable e-commerce functionality..

Headwinds

Brand-name ambiguity with Rimac Automobili (Croatia) creates impersonation and PR risk., Repeated customer-service complaints visible in public forums reduce conversion/trust., Large third-party marketing/analytics footprint creates privacy and supply-chain exposure..

Our Verdict

Business Quality Good
Technical / Infrastructure Good
Reputation & Trust Moderate
Legal / Brand Moderate
Security Moderate

Investment Thesis

The Bull Case

3 Points
📈

Large, local audience and category position

  • About 600k monthly visits with ~97% traffic from Peru, indicating strong brand reach in the local market.
  • Category rank places the entity among the market leaders for finance/insurance in Peru.
  • High pages-per-visit (~4.8) and long session times (~309s) suggest engaged users for cross-sell opportunities.
🛠️

Mature enterprise platform

  • Uses Adobe Experience Manager / Contentstack, AWS CloudFront and Amazon hosting—consistent with enterprise operations.
  • Analytics and A/B tooling (Adobe, Google Analytics, Hotjar) support digital optimization and measurable growth.
  • Email and anti-spoofing controls (Office365 mail routing, DMARC=reject) reduce phishing risk from spoofed mail.
💳

Clear commercial capability

  • Payment rails and e-commerce components detected (Visa, MasterCard, Stripe signals in tech traces).
  • Multiple product pages and integrated funnels (remarketing pixels, conversion tracking) support monetization.

The Bear Case

3 Points
⚠️

Reputation / customer experience issues

  • Public complaints focus on responsiveness and customer service; this can depress renewals and referrals.
  • No populated Trustpilot profile found in the data feeds, so centralized consumer review signals are weak.
🔀

Brand confusion & impersonation risk

  • The RIMAC name is shared by several unrelated entities (notably Rimac Automobili); this increases the chance of impersonation scams and mistaken press/legal inquiries.
  • USPTO records show many RIMAC registrations by different owners, which can complicate cross-border enforcement.
🧩

Operational exposure to third parties

  • Large surface of third-party tools (adtech, analytics, CDNs, A/B/testing) increases privacy and supply-chain attack vectors.
  • Dependence on multiple CDNs/hosting regions and vendor services adds coordination and contractual risk during incidents.

Entity & Domain Integrity

Long-registered domain (mid-1990s) used by a Peruvian insurance brand. DNS and SSL point to modern cloud hosting (AWS/CloudFront) and the zone is configured with multiple verification records and an email anti-spoofing policy.

Registrar Network Solutions, LLC
Domain Age Aug 21, 1996 (29 years old)
Security Status
Registry Locked SSL: Amazon RSA 2048 M03

Reputation Analysis

0

0 Reviews

Trustpilot

Customer Sentiment Analysis

No authoritative evidence that the official rimac.com site is a scam. Public complaints are primarily service/communication issues rather than fraud. Brand-name overlap with an unrelated automotive firm is the main reputational complication.

Common Themes
No themes detected.

Traffic Distribution

Top Countries Traffic Share Trend
Peru
97.20%
Colombia
1.02%
United States
0.51%
Spain
0.33%
Mexico
0.30%

Competitive Landscape

Competitor Type Threat Analysis
Large national insurers Price and distribution (Pacífico, Interseguro, La Positiva) — these firms compete on scale, broker networks, and multi-product bundles.
Regional/global insurers (local channels) International brands (Mapfre, Seguros Falabella) compete on digital channels and brand trust; they can undercut or partner on bancassurance.
Comparison & aggregator sites Price/lead aggregators (comparabien, soat portals) capture early-stage shoppers via SEO and comparison tools.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

  • Large, local audience and category leadership in Peru.
  • Enterprise-grade tech stack and multi-region CDN for resilience.
  • Payment and e-commerce capability on-site.

Weaknesses

  • Public customer-support complaints and weak centralized review presence.
  • Complex third-party tag footprint increases privacy and security exposure.
  • Name overlap with an unrelated international automotive brand (search/noise).

Opportunities

  • Use analytics and A/B tooling to raise conversion and upsell rates across products.
  • Streamline and publicize official contact/verification channels to reduce impersonation risk.
  • Expand digital distribution and aggregator partnerships to capture price-sensitive segments.

Threats

  • Impersonation scams leveraging the RIMAC name.
  • Regulatory changes or enforcement in insurance markets increasing operating cost.
  • Third-party platform outages or adtech data-leak incidents affecting user trust.

Risk Register

Identified Risk Impact Mitigation
Brand impersonation and third-party scams (name confusion with Rimac Automobili) High Monitor web and social channels for impersonation, run takedown/notice processes, and communicate official contact channels clearly on the site and Google Business listings.
Customer-service failures reducing retention Medium Improve SLA, centralize complaint resolution, publish response times, and invest in CRM / call-center tooling to close gaps visible in public reviews.
Third-party supply-chain or privacy incidents (adtech and analytics) Medium Audit third-party scripts, tighten CSP,CORS rules, reduce unnecessary ad/marketing tags, and contractually require security/privacy controls from providers.
Regulatory / compliance exposure (insurance data and cross-border trademarks) High Maintain P&C and data-privacy compliance programs, keep legal counsel for trademark conflicts, and document cross-border data flows and lawful bases for processing.
Email or domain spoofing (phishing) High DMARC is present (reject) and SPF includes protection; keep records up to date and monitor for domain lookalikes; enroll important domains in brand monitoring.

Appendix & Sources

Key Citations

Data Sources Used

similartech_v1 similar_web_api_v1 website_traffic_stats_v1 website_contacts_scraper_v1 whois_dns_ssl_v1 uspto_trademark_search_v1 crypto_scam_sniffer_v1 google_safe_browsing_v1 google_places_v1 google_news_v1 perplexity_questions_v1 trustpilot_v1 linkedin_business_v1 builtwith_api_v21

Disclaimer

This report is an open-source intelligence snapshot as of the report date. It aggregates automated scans and commercial telemetry; it does not replace a legal, financial, or technical audit. Observed signals include mixed-source noise (notably references to an unrelated automotive company that shares the RIMAC name). Verify sensitive actions (payments, contracts, legal takedowns) with direct corporate contacts and signed documentation.