Executive Summary
Global Rank
#350,044
Monthly Visits
113,200
Avg Duration
1m 14s
Pages/Visit
2.27
Strategic Overview
Multi-cloud, multi-region hosting and CDN stack, API integrations with over 2,000 banks, Multi-currency and multiple payment method support.
Paused onboarding and transaction support as of late 2025, Escalating customer complaints about refunds and compliance, Loss of momentum or regulatory intervention risk.
Our Verdict
Upside & Downside Analysis
The Bull Case
2 PointsStrong API-driven payments platform
- Seamless integration for merchants via open banking APIs.
- Supports 2,000+ banks and various payment methods (Pix, cards, Boleto, wallets, etc).
- Robust usage demonstrated by 100,000+ monthly site visits.
Proven Adoption Prior to Pause
- Platform connected merchants to 100M+ potential customers globally.
- Numerous business clients reported operational savings and compliance ease.
The Bear Case
2 PointsBusiness Uncertainty & Service Interruptions
- No new customers or transactions accepted as of late 2025.
- Company status unclear; risk of insolvency or regulatory restriction.
- Support limited to refunds and chargebacks for existing users.
Mixed Reputation and Brand Risk
- Significant public complaints about refunds and chargebacks.
- Accusations (unverified) of facilitating illicit online gambling.
- Potential for negative press to further damage brand.
Domain Integrity
Domain is securely registered with reputable DNS and SSL providers, and no malware or phishing threats are currently detected.
| Registrar | Name.com, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Domain Age | Dec 22, 2020 (5 years old) |
| Security Status |
Registry Locked
SSL: Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2
|
Reputation
19 Reviews
Sentiment Analysis
Reputation is mixed—common complaints center around failed refunds, poor customer support, and alleged associations with questionable merchants. No evidence of outright fraud but brand confusion is a risk.
Common Themes
Traffic Distribution
| Top Countries | Traffic Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|
|
Belarus
|
22.20% |
|
|
United States
|
6.30% |
|
|
Nigeria
|
5.10% |
|
|
Brazil
|
4.10% |
|
|
United Kingdom
|
4.10% |
|
Competition
| Competitor Type | Threat Analysis |
|---|---|
| Global payment processors (e.g., Stripe, Adyen, Rapyd, GoCardless, Coingate) | Scale, banking relationships, regulatory sophistication, brand recognition |
| Open banking API platforms (Volt, Truelayer, Kontomatik) | Direct overlap on bank account payments, KYC, and merchant APIs |
| Traditional merchant acquirers | Conservative clients may prefer established relationships; stickiness for B2B flows |
| Crypto payment gateways (Bitpay, CoinGate) | Alternate flows and regulatory arbitrage in emerging markets |
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
- Well-built and secure technical stack
- Breadth of payment methods and currencies
- Proven ability to support business users at scale
Weaknesses
- Temporary halt on onboarding and payments
- Mixed reviews (slow refunds, poor compliance)
- No unique brand protection in key markets
Opportunities
- Resume onboarding after regulatory clearance
- Expand into additional markets or verticals via open banking
- Leverage global API infrastructure for recurring/revenue-based offerings
Threats
- Permanent closure or insolvency if pause extends
- Legal action from clients or regulators
- Negative press/competitor encroachment during downtime
Tech Stack
Cloud Infrastructure
Platform runs on a mix of Microsoft Azure (multiple EU and US regions), AWS, and Cloudflare for global CDN, security, and redundancy.
SaaS and Payment Integrations
Payment stack supports Adyen, Stripe, PayPal, Apple Pay, Amazon Payments, Visa, MasterCard, and many regional methods (PIX, Boleto, etc.).
Privacy and Security
Implements robust cookie consent, DMARC, DKIM, SPF, HSTS, DNSSEC, and anti-fraud/analytics providers (Intercom, Smartlook, Hotjar).
APIs & Developer Tooling
Public/open APIs, REST/GraphQL endpoints, multi-language portals; supports sandbox/test environments for merchants and banks.
Key Risks
| Identified Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory non-compliance (AML, KYC, payment licensing) | High | Pausing new onboarding and new funds handling; maintains compliance and refund desk for existing clients. |
| Brand and trademark confusion | Medium | Distinct digital presence, but no unique trademark in North America; business-to-business focus reduces consumer confusion. |
| Negative reputation from refund and disputed transaction complaints | Medium | Active customer support and public complaint handling; refunds and chargebacks honored where documentation provided. |
| Revenue disruption from operational pause | High | Cost containment, support focus, no expansion or new client exposure. |
Contacts
Department Points of Contact
Appendix & Sources
Key Citations
-
SimilarWeb: Traffic Analytics for noda.live
Provides monthly visit estimates, bounce rate, top countries, and traffic referral breakdown.
-
Trustpilot: Noda.live Company Profile
Contains user reviews and public complaints with company responses to issues raised.
-
USPTO Trademark Records for 'NODA'
Lists multiple trademark registrations for the word 'NODA' by various unrelated companies.
-
noda.live About and Legal Pages
Company page with team biographies, company status, and support contacts.
-
Google News: Noda Live Reviews and Announcements
Recent news coverage highlights user experiences and platform changes.
-
Perplexity: Noda.live Review and Legal Risk Synthesis
Aggregated review sentiment and fraud risk assessment from third-party review aggregators.
Data Sources Used
Disclaimer
This report was assembled from publicly available data as of February 2026. Information may have changed or may be incomplete; no investment advice is given. Prospective investors should conduct direct verification and consult regulatory filings.