Logo

Fantasyblox.com 360° Intelligence

Report Date: Jan 21, 2026
Risk Level: Moderate
Vet New Site

Executive Summary

Global Rank

#474,376

Monthly Visits

71,464

Avg Duration

3m 17s

Pages/Visit

4.63

Strategic Overview

Business Moats

Established moderate web traffic and search visibility for niche keywords, No direct competitors detected in public competitive datasets, No blacklisting or serious security vulnerabilities identified.

Market Headwinds

Lack of transparency about business owners and leadership, Mixed reputation and ambiguous third-party risk signals, No official company listings, physical locations, or verified social proof.

Our Verdict

Business Quality Moderate
Technical Footprint Good
Reputation Moderate
Legal & Brand Moderate

Upside & Downside Analysis

The Bull Case

2 Points
📈

Emergent Niche Traffic

  • Above 70K monthly visits, with strong visit length and low bounce rates
  • Good engagement stats (4.63 pages/visit, average 197 seconds per user)
  • Strongest audience in Brazil, US, and Poland, hinting at global reach
🛡️

Technical Soundness

  • Modern security certificates and no detected malware or phishing via Google Safe Browsing
  • Domain registered with Hostinger, a credible hosting provider
  • No evidence of crypto scam blacklisting or major reputational warning flags

The Bear Case

2 Points
⚠️

Opacity and Potential Credibility Gap

  • No identifiable business management, no LinkedIn profile or company info
  • Contact transparency is minimal; only social links, no public support or legal contact point
  • Trust ratings vary widely (Scam Detector low, ScamAdviser moderate/high) with no verifiable public user reviews
👤

No Legal, Location, or Regulatory Footprint

  • No trademark or company registrations discovered in available US records
  • No listed physical address, regulatory license, or compliance documentation
  • Absence of third-party oversight or public-facing policies on compliance

Domain Integrity

Recently registered domain, protected from simple transfer, uses reputable DNS and SSL infrastructure, and is not flagged for security or malware risks.

Registrar HOSTINGER operations, UAB
Domain Age Sep 4, 2025 (4 months old)
Security Status
Registry Locked SSL: R13

Reputation

0

0 Reviews

Trustpilot

Sentiment Analysis

No major review site presence; some external scam checkers show mixed findings, with one rating low trust and another moderately high. No formal fraud or scam reports located.

Common Themes
No themes detected.

Traffic Distribution

Top Countries Traffic Share Trend
Brazil
44.00%
United States
17.50%
Poland
14.90%
Canada
9.90%
India
6.00%

Competition

Competitor Type Threat Analysis
Other fantasy gaming/values tracker sites Low—No major competitors identified in SimilarWeb, but potential for undisclosed or emerging rivals in the niche.

Tech Stack

🔒

Web Hosting & Security

Hosted on Hostinger, uses RSA-SHA256 SSL, and managed by mainstream DNS infrastructure (dns-parking.com); technical setup is in line with modern security standards.

Key Risks

Identified Risk Impact Mitigation
Absence of public business and leadership information raises legitimacy concerns. Medium Start with small, test transactions; look for future updates on team transparency.
Potential legal or regulatory risks due to lack of clear licensing or compliance information. Medium Monitor news sources for legal/shutdown actions; seek user confirmation before large involvement.
Mixed third-party reputation scores suggest possibility of inconsistent user experience or undisclosed risks. Medium Rely only on trusted payment methods; follow community signal changes over time.

Contacts

Department Points of Contact

No department contacts listed.

Appendix & Sources

Key Citations

Data Sources Used

SimilarWeb WHOIS Google Safe Browsing USPTO Trademark Search Crypto Scam Sniffer ScamAdviser Scam Detector Perplexity/aggregated web search

Disclaimer

This report is based on publicly accessible data and automated intelligence tools. No in-person verification conducted. Potential risks may exist that are not detected by online signals and assessment should not be taken as investment advice.