Logo

Aurumneobank.com 360° Intelligence

Report Date: Dec 8, 2025
Risk Level: High
Vet New Site

Executive Summary

Global Rank

#-

Monthly Visits

0

Avg Duration

0m 0s

Pages/Visit

0.00

Strategic Overview

Business Moats

Niche crypto branding and aggressive online marketing, Ties to a larger 'Aurum' ecosystem for cross-promotion.

Market Headwinds

Extremely high regulatory and scam risk, Negative publicity and user complaints dominating search results, Lack of product differentiation or proven technology, Anonymous leadership and opaque business operations.

Our Verdict

Business Quality Bad
Market Traction Bad
Reputation Bad
Operations & Technology Moderate
Compliance/Legal Bad

Upside & Downside Analysis

The Bull Case

2 Points
🪙

Crypto Niche & Market Timing

  • Positioned in the crypto/web3 banking narrative, which has seen some large valuations in legit projects.
  • Marketing aligns with growing demand for crypto-fiat bridges and AI-powered retail finance, targeting a speculative segment.
🚀

Aggressive Branding

  • Visually polished site and roadmap marketing may attract crypto users unfamiliar with risk signals.
  • Participates in multiple 'Aurum' ecosystem projects, amplifying outreach via various channels.

The Bear Case

3 Points
⚠️

Clear Evidence of Fraud/Scam Patterns

  • Numerous independent reviews and investigations associate Aurum-branded banks with HYIP/Ponzi fraud.
  • Lack of financial regulation, licenses, or filings; no meaningful disclosure of ownership or operations.
  • Widespread complaints of lost funds and blocked withdrawals.
📉

No Real Market Traction or Product Proof

  • Near-zero real user traffic; no presence on standard reputation/trust platforms.
  • No independent verification of customers, investors, or revenues.
  • Project relies on marketing promises, unsubstantiated user testimonials, and roadmap videos, with no proof of real product delivery.
🚫

Legal and Regulatory Exposure

  • May be subject to legal action for unlicensed financial activity or consumer fraud if regulators take notice.
  • No records in US/major court databases, but the business structure and disclosures are minimal and opaque.
  • The use of “bank” in branding without licensing can trigger swift regulatory intervention.

Domain Integrity

Recently registered (Nov 2024) with privacy-protected details, using Namecheap and Cloudflare for basic security. SSL is valid, and no threats are currently detected by Google.

Registrar NAMECHEAP INC
Domain Age Nov 23, 2024 (1 year old)
Security Status
Registry Locked SSL: WE1

Reputation

0

0 Reviews

Trustpilot

Sentiment Analysis

Public sources overwhelmingly identify Aurum Neobank as a probable scam/HYIP linked to past Aurum-branded investment frauds, with zero evidence of regulatory compliance and widespread complaints about loss of funds.

Common Themes
No themes detected.

Traffic Distribution

Top Countries Traffic Share Trend

Competition

Competitor Type Threat Analysis
Legitimate Crypto Banks/Fintechs Well-funded, licensed, and regulated operators (e.g., Revolut, N26, Monzo) set standards in compliance, security, and customer trust.
Crypto Wallets & DeFi Platforms Battle for the same user group—crypto enthusiasts looking for hybrid finance features, but legitimate platforms provide transparency and lower risk.
Fraudulent HYIP/Scam Operations Frequent entry/exit scams in the space lead to rapid regulatory and reputational blowback, and cannibalize any customer trust in similar branding.

Tech Stack

🖥️

Web Builder & Hosting

Website designed with Tilda (simple hosted solution), built on basic CDN (Cloudflare, jsdelivr) and cloud platforms (WebFlow, AWS Lambda, Fastly), with no evidence of robust/enterprise IT architecture.

🔒

Security & SSL

Utilizes SSL, Cloudflare protection, enforced HTTPS (HSTS), and privacy-focused DNS records, but no advanced security or compliance attestations found.

Key Risks

Identified Risk Impact Mitigation
Regulatory actions for unlicensed use of 'bank' and financial services marketing. High None observed on the site; risk is inherent due to business model/presentation.
Collapse as a fraudulent scheme, causing user/investor losses. High No credible mitigation; lack of transparency, anonymous ownership, and prior patterns point to exit/fraud risk.
Reputation destroyed by scam warnings and negative press. Medium Floods the web with promotional content, but negative coverage dominates independent search.
Service discontinuity or rapid website takedown. High Cloud-based web hosting allows quick changes, but does not protect customer assets.

Contacts

Department Points of Contact

No department contacts listed.

Social Presence

Appendix & Sources

Key Citations

Data Sources Used

SimilarWeb Whois/Namecheap BuiltWith Perplexity Google Safe Browsing Investing.com YouTube EMIS company registry

Disclaimer

This investor due diligence report synthesizes best-available public data as of Dec 2025. Site status, ownership, legal registration, and regulatory risks should be further verified via official filings and direct inquiry before any investment or partnership. This is not investment advice.