Logo

Aparthy.com 360° Intelligence

Report Date: Nov 11, 2025
Risk Level High

Executive Summary

Global Rank

#369,244

Monthly Visits

104,728

Avg Duration

1m 51s

Pages/Visit

1.91

Strategic Overview

Economic Moats

Shopify infrastructure with mainstream payment processors (reduces payment-failure risk for buyers)., Active social presence (Facebook/Instagram/Twitter) which helps direct marketing and retention., Registered trademark application for APARTHY (USPTO filing exists)..

Headwinds

Large volume of independent complaints about fulfillment, refunds, and product mismatch., Opaque ownership and a very recent domain registration (limited operational track record)., Aggressive marketing tactics (reported fake testimonials, countdown urgency) that attract scrutiny and erode trust..

Our Verdict

Business quality Moderate
Reputation & reviews Bad
Technology & operations Good
Legal / brand Moderate

Investment Thesis

The Bull Case

2 Points
📈

DTC brand with traction

  • • Estimated ~105k monthly visits and strong US share (~81%), indicating effective customer acquisition.
  • • Standard marketing and analytics stack (Shopify, Klaviyo, Google Ads/Facebook) supports scalable paid acquisition.
  • • USPTO application for 'APARTHY' suggests intent to formalize brand ownership.
🛒

Operationally simple to scale

  • • Fulfillment appears compatible with dropship/3PL models, so margins can improve with tighter vendor control.
  • • Mainstream payment rails (Visa, Amex, PayPal, Apple/Google Pay) reduce friction for conversion and chargebacks.

The Bear Case

3 Points
⚠️

Reputational liabilities and churn

  • • Many independent reports of wrong items, delayed shipments, and denied refunds — these drive negative PR and high churn.
  • • Accusations of fake testimonials and misleading claims harm long‑term customer trust and increase return/chargeback risk.
🧾

Regulatory and legal risk from marketing claims

  • • Public claims implying FDA approval or clinical endorsement are misleading for cosmetic products and may invite regulatory scrutiny.
  • • If fulfillment/refund patterns continue, consumer protection complaints and payment disputes could escalate costs materially.
🚨

Customer support scale and cost

  • • Multiple complaints describe unresponsive or inconsistent customer service; resolving legacy issues at scale will be resource intensive and costly.

Entity & Domain Integrity

New (2024) Shopify site using Google Domains name servers and a valid SSL certificate; DNS and MX records present, basic anti‑fraud TXT entries for subscription service.

Registrar Tucows Domains Inc.
Domain Age Sep 15, 2024 (1 year old)
Security Status
Registry Locked SSL: WE1

Reputation Analysis

0

24 Reviews

Trustpilot

Customer Sentiment Analysis

Overall reputation is mixed to negative: technical and payment infrastructure appears legitimate but customer experience signals (fulfillment, returns, alleged fake testimonials) raise serious trust issues.

Common Themes
Non‑delivery or long delays Wrong or re‑branded product received (e.g., 'Hoegoa') Refunds denied or onerous (gift card offers instead of cash refund) Some verified positive support interactions exist (address fixes, billing issues resolved)

Traffic Distribution

Top Countries Traffic Share Trend
United States
80.97%
India
5.59%
United Kingdom
5.50%
Australia
4.55%
France
3.39%

Competitive Landscape

Competitor Type Threat Analysis
Established hair regrowth brands Brands like Rogaine, Nutrafol and clinically positioned products compete on trust, clinical evidence and distribution; Aparthy lacks comparable clinical claims and established retail presence.
DTC / dropship hair supplements Low‑cost DTC operators and white‑label suppliers can undercut on price and replicate formulations; Aparthy may be vulnerable if supply chain or labeling is inconsistent.
Marketplace substitutes Amazon/eBay sellers offering proven ingredient sets with reliable fulfillment pose threat to customer acquisition and retention when Aparthy delivery issues persist.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

  • Large recent traffic and strong U.S. audience provides a base for scaled paid acquisition.
  • Uses mainstream e‑commerce and payment infrastructure (Shopify, PayPal, major cards).
  • USPTO trademark filing for APARTHY indicates intent to formalize brand.

Weaknesses

  • Significant negative customer reports about delivery, product mismatch and refunds.
  • Opaque ownership and short operating history reduce credibility with partners and consumers.
  • Aggressive/possibly misleading marketing practices cited in independent reviews.

Opportunities

  • Cleaning up fulfillment and demonstrating transparent testing/labeling could convert hesitant buyers and improve LTV.
  • Formalizing supply chain and quality controls would enable wholesale/retail partnerships.
  • Investing in verified reviews and third‑party testing can help recover trust.

Threats

  • Escalating consumer complaints leading to higher chargebacks, ad account restrictions, or payment provider intervention.
  • Regulatory action if marketing claims remain misleading (cosmetic vs. drug distinction).
  • Negative viral reviews or influencer exposés that further damage acquisition efficiency.

Risk Register

Identified Risk Impact Mitigation
Widespread negative customer experiences (fulfillment, wrong product, refund denials) High Require seller to provide fulfillment KPIs, proof of inventories/3PL contracts, and a remediation plan (refund backlog, replacement shipments) before partnership or investment.
Chargebacks and increased payment disputes High Audit payment dispute rates via merchant statements; insist on escrowed performance milestones or holdbacks until dispute rate improves.
Regulatory exposure from misleading claims High Review marketing copy for unsupported FDA/medical claims; require legal sign‑off and corrective disclaimers; keep records of ingredient sourcing and testing.
Opaque ownership and vendor relationships Medium Perform corporate due diligence (beneficial owner, supplier contracts, manufacturing certificates) and contractually require transparency clauses.
Reputational contagion via influencer/viral negative coverage Medium Establish crisis comms plan, refund policy improvements, and independent third‑party testing to rebuild trust before scaling marketing spend.
Trademark or IP disputes Medium USPTO filing exists; verify ownership chain and maintain counsel to monitor oppositions or third‑party claims.

Appendix & Sources

Key Citations

Data Sources Used

similartech_v1 similar_web_api_v1 website_contacts_scraper_v1 whois_dns_ssl_v1 uspto_trademark_search_v1 crypto_scam_sniffer_v1 google_safe_browsing_v1 google_places_v1 google_news_v1 perplexity_questions_v1 trustpilot_v1 linkedin_business_v1

Disclaimer

This report aggregates public and third‑party intelligence as of the report date. It is not legal or financial advice. Verify material facts (merchant statements, supply contracts, legal opinions) before making investment or partnership decisions.