Logo

Agroserver.ru 360° Intelligence

Report Date: Nov 26, 2025
Risk Level: Moderate
Vet New Site

Executive Summary

Global Rank

#23,298

Monthly Visits

~2.00M

Avg Duration

4m 20s

Pages/Visit

7.38

Strategic Overview

Business Moats

Large, Russia-focused audience with ~2M monthly visits and top category rank in agriculture., Established presence (domain long-lived since mid-2000s) and broad catalog of listings and subdomains serving regional markets., Integration with local analytics and ad networks (Yandex Metrika, Rambler) that support regional reach and monetization..

Market Headwinds

Marketplace model concentrates counterparty risk — fraud or poor listings by third-party sellers are plausible., Limited transparency on registrant/ownership in WHOIS reduces governance visibility., Some historical use of old front-end libraries (legacy jQuery versions) could raise security/maintenance costs..

Our Verdict

Business Quality Moderate
Traffic & Engagement Good
Technical Operations Moderate
Reputation & Safety Good
Legal / IP Moderate

Upside & Downside Analysis

The Bull Case

3 Points
📈

Large, engaged audience in a niche vertical

  • About 2.0M visits/month with low bounce (≈31.6%) and ~7.4 pages/visit — strong engagement for classifieds.
  • Top country share concentrated in Russia (~93.8%), simplifying localized monetization and partnerships.
  • Category rank shows leadership in Heavy Industry & Agriculture in SimilarWeb data.
💳

Built-in monetization channels

  • Uses regional ad networks (Yandex, Rambler, ADFOX) and shows cart functionality indicating direct commerce or lead generation.
  • Numerous supplier subdomains and product listings provide immediate inventory for upsell or premium listing fees.
  • Existing social and multimedia footprint (YouTube, Facebook, Instagram) supports marketing extensions.
🛠️

Low technical entry barrier to scale

  • Standard, widely-supported stack (nginx, HTTPS, common JS libraries) and hosting footprint that can be scaled or migrated.
  • Evidence of long-term indexing (CrUX/CommonCrawl) helps SEO-driven traffic growth at modest incremental cost.
  • Local integrations (Yandex Metrika, Russian ad networks) smooth regional customer acquisition.

The Bear Case

3 Points
⚠️

Marketplace counterparty risk

  • Platform lists many third-party sellers; disputes, bogus listings or payment fraud could surface and damage reputation.
  • No evidence of escrow/payment protection policy surfaced in the collected signals — increases buyer risk.
  • High share of organic/search traffic (≈62.6%) means sudden SEO visibility changes could materially reduce volume.
🔍

Limited corporate transparency

  • WHOIS registrant field is null and public ownership details are sparse, complicating legal or vendor risk checks.
  • No clear public filings, investor data, or audited financials were found; valuing the business would be guesswork.
  • Absence from international trademark registers (USPTO search returned no matches) increases the risk of brand disputes or impersonation in other markets.
🧰

Technical & maintenance debt

  • Signals show older JS versions and legacy artifacts (historical detection of older jQuery); these can hide vulnerabilities and increase maintenance cost.
  • Dependence on regional hosting/ad stacks may complicate international expansion or introduce geopolitical hosting risk.
  • If payments expand, missing clear payment-processing evidence could delay building compliant, secure flows.

Domain Integrity

Long-lived Russian agricultural marketplace domain registered through REGTIME-RU with delegated name servers; no Safe Browsing or crypto blacklist hits found, but registrant contact is not publicly listed in WHOIS.

Registrar REGTIME-RU
Domain Age 1119211200 (epoch seconds) — approx. 2005 (WHOIS creation_date 1119211200)
Security Status
Unlocked SSL: Valid

Reputation

0

0 Reviews

Trustpilot

Sentiment Analysis

No major scam reports or blacklist listings found; third-party reputation sources available in Russian-language search show site functioning as a classifieds portal. Platform-level complaints are not prominent in indexed sources.

Common Themes
No themes detected.

Traffic Distribution

Top Countries Traffic Share Trend
Russian Federation
93.85%
Finland
0.83%
Belarus
0.79%
Kazakhstan
0.48%
Uzbekistan
0.31%

Competition

Competitor Type Threat Analysis
General agricultural marketplaces / directories Sites like agroru.com, agrobase.ru and direct.farm compete for B2B listings, classified traffic and ad revenue.
Specialist parts & suppliers Platforms such as kramp.ru and pesticidy.ru serve specialized buyer needs (parts, agrochemicals) and may capture higher-margin transactions.
Regional classifieds and industry media Localized classifieds and trade publications (zol.ru, glavagronom.ru) capture niche communities, events and advertiser dollars.

Tech Stack

🖥️

Hosting & Edge

Server IP located in Russia (A record 212.41.28.197); historical and current detections include Selectel, FastVPS and evidence of Cloudflare Radar listing. Primary web server reported as nginx.

📊

Analytics & Ads

Uses Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics (historic/universal and classic tags), Rambler and ADFOX — consistent with region-focused traffic measurement and ad monetization.

⚙️

Frontend / Platform

Common web technologies detected: jQuery (multiple versions including legacy 1.8.x and newer 3.7.1), Google Web Fonts, mobile viewport meta tags; evidence of custom cart functionality and embedded YouTube content.

📬

Mail & DNS

MX points to mail.agroserver.ru; SPF DNS TXT record exists (v=spf1 ip4:212.41.28.197 +a +mx ~all). Nameservers are on fastdns24 network.

Key Risks

Identified Risk Impact Mitigation
Third-party seller fraud or low-quality listings High Introduce/verify seller KYC, add escrow or recommended payment providers, implement stronger review moderation and clear dispute resolution policies.
Limited corporate transparency (WHOIS registrant not public) Medium Request corporate records from the operator, check local Russian registries, or require platform to publish legal entity and contact data for commercial partners.
Dependency on organic search traffic Medium Diversify acquisition channels (paid, partnerships, direct enterprise sales), and strengthen retention (accounts, subscriptions) to reduce volatility from algorithm changes.
Technical debt / legacy libraries Medium Audit front-end and server stacks, patch or upgrade legacy JS components, run periodic security scans and implement WAF/monitoring.
Regulatory / geopolitical hosting risk High Map critical infrastructure, maintain offsite backups, and consider multi-region hosting or contingency for cross-border clients.

Contacts

Department Points of Contact

No department contacts listed.

Appendix & Sources

Key Citations

Data Sources Used

similartech_v1 similar_web_api_v1 website_traffic_stats_v1 website_contacts_scraper_v1 whois_dns_ssl_v1 builtwith_api_v21 uspto_trademark_search_v1 crypto_scam_sniffer_v1 google_safe_browsing_v1 google_news_v1 perplexity_questions_v1 linkedin_business_v1

Disclaimer

This report synthesizes third-party data snapshots and automated scans. It is not a legal, tax or full security audit. Facts (dates, counts, ranks) reflect the cited sources at the report date and may change; verify with original sources for transaction-level decisions.