WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Xgroovy.com

Report Date October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Quick verdict: ⚠️ Suspicious. xgroovy.com is a high-traffic adult site (about 120–121 million monthly visits) with modern infrastructure (Cloudflare CDN, valid TLS) and a multi-year registration (registered April 6, 2019). Key concerns: WHOIS is privacy-protected via a Panama-based privacy service, some reputation sites flag low trust scores, and there are no clear contact emails on the site. There is no evidence of malware or Google Safe Browsing blocks, and no documented user-reported financial losses in public sources — but the mixed trust signals and hidden ownership justify caution before any transaction or data sharing.

Confidence Score
53%

Risk Insights

🛡️

High traffic but opaque ownership

About 120M monthly visits and global rank ~241 — site is popular.
WHOIS uses privacy service (Panama), so operator identity is concealed.
High usage plus hidden ownership is a common pattern for ad-heavy adult sites; exercise caution.
✅

Technical basics in place

Site uses HTTPS and Cloudflare CDN; SSL valid through Dec 11, 2025.
No Google Safe Browsing matches from available scans.
These controls reduce some technical risks but do not verify the operator.

Contradictory Signals

Popular, well-maintained sites can still score poorly on automated reputation services if ownership is private or the site’s content type (adult) triggers conservative heuristics.

Signal A: High traffic + stable technical security

Signal B: Hidden WHOIS + mixed low reputation scores

Category Scores

Identity 40/100
Reputation 45/100
Technical 80/100
Content 50/100
Legal 60/100
Business Validity 55/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • WHOIS privacy + Panama-based privacy provider hides owner identity, making accountability harder.
  • Mixed/low trust ratings from some reputation scanners (e.g., Scam Detector score low) despite technical safety scans.
  • No direct contact emails or phone numbers found via automated scraping, limiting ways to verify the operator.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & WHOIS transparency

Score: 40/100
Failed

"Registration date is April 6, 2019, which shows multi-year presence; however the registrant is listed as 'Private Whois' with contact routed through an anonymizer service, reducing traceability and raising caution for transactions."

Reason: Domain registered in 2019 but uses privacy-protection via a Panama-based service instead of a public operator name.

Traffic & popularity

Score: 85/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb reports roughly 120–121 million monthly visits and a global rank around #241, suggesting large legitimate traffic volume but also greater attractiveness to malicious actors and aggressive ad networks."

Reason: Very high monthly visits and strong global rank indicate an active, widely visited site.

Blacklist / malware / phishing checks

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Automated scans returned no Google Safe Browsing threats and crypto-scam sniffers show no blacklist entry; still test any downloads and avoid clicks on suspicious ads."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing and not flagged by crypto scam lists in the available scans.

Contactability & ownership verification

Score: 35/100
Failed

"Scraper found Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest profiles but no corporate email or phone number on the public site. Lack of contact points makes merchant verification and dispute resolution harder."

Reason: No direct business emails or phones were scraped; only social links were found.

Technical security (TLS, CDN)

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Certificate valid from 2025-09-12 until 2025-12-11 and DNS served by Cloudflare; these are standard protections that reduce the risk of basic injection or direct hosting abuse."

Reason: TLS certificate is valid and site uses Cloudflare CDN/nameservers.

Trademark & brand impersonation

Score: 70/100
Passed

"USPTO search returned zero results for 'xgroovy.com' which means there is no immediate trademark claim in the US database, but absence of a trademark does not imply legitimacy."

Reason: No USPTO trademark matches for the exact domain term were found; low risk of trademark conflict shown.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Do not share payment details or personally identifying documents with the site; avoid creating paid accounts until legitimacy is confirmed.
  • 2
    If you must interact, test with a throwaway email and block pop-ups and downloads using browser settings or an ad-blocker.
  • 3
    Search for independent user complaints on forums and consumer sites (e.g., Scam Detector, Trustpilot) and save screenshots if you encounter suspicious activity.
  • 4
    Consider running a malware scan on any downloaded files and avoid clicking unfamiliar ads or offers on the site.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →