WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Wingo.com

Report Date October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

⚠️ Verdict — Suspicious. wingo.com presents strong technical and traffic signals (about 2.8M monthly visits, Cloudflare + Amazon hosting, major card and PayPal payment options, working SSL). At the same time, multiple independent review threads and forum posts link the exact domain (or closely named services) to serious consumer complaints about lost funds and unresolved refunds. The signals contradict: infrastructure and business integrations look real, but reputation reports and name collisions with other “Wingo” services raise material risk. Recommendation: proceed with caution; verify bookings and payments through a bank or known reseller, and avoid large up-front transfers.

Confidence Score
78%

Risk Insights

🛡️

High technical legitimacy

CloudFlare + Amazon hosting, HTTPS, and verification TXT records present.
Major payment options available (cards, PayPal).
No Safe Browsing or crypto blacklist hits.
⚠️

Reputation mismatch — proceed carefully

Several independent review threads allege lost funds or refund problems.
Some scam reports may reference a different ‘Wingo’ entity, creating confusion.
Verify booking confirmations and payment receipts directly before transferring large sums.

Contradictory Signals

High-quality infrastructure and news coverage point to a real airline site, yet complaint clusters and name collisions with alleged scam services create real risk for consumers.

Signal A: Strong traffic, payments, and tech stack (signals of legitimate commercial site).

Signal B: Multiple user complaints alleging lost funds and refund failures (signals of potential fraud or disputed business practices).

Category Scores

Identity 80/100
Reputation 45/100
Technical 90/100
Content 85/100
Legal 70/100
Business Validity 75/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple consumer reports and review-site complaints alleging lost funds, difficulty obtaining refunds, or suspicious charges associated with this domain or closely named services.
  • Confusing brand overlap with other entities named “Wingo” (notably Wingo Markets) that have independent scam allegations, which can mislead consumers.
  • Google Places shows a U.S. address that may not match expected corporate HQ for the airline brand, introducing a location inconsistency to verify.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & registrar

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Long-standing registration and a corporate registrar reduce the likelihood this is a throwaway scam domain; still verify ownership if needed."

Reason: Domain has a long registration history (creation_date epoch 825570000) and uses a corporate registrar (CSC).

SSL certificate validity

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Valid certificate and modern signature algorithm (ecdsa-with-SHA256) are expected for any legitimate commerce site but do not prove business intent."

Reason: Active SSL issued; certificate valid until 2025-12-13.

Traffic and usage

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Traffic patterns (search + direct) are consistent with an operating airline website; bots or paid funnels would usually show different signals."

Reason: High monthly visits (~2.8M) and multiple pages per visit indicate real user activity.

Payment methods and checkout integrations

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Presence of major payment processors suggests proper merchant setup and buyer-protection options, but does not eliminate fraud risk in operations or refunds."

Reason: Site lists major card networks and PayPal and shows cart functionality.

Public reputation & user complaints

Score: 45/100
Failed

"Reputation signals are mixed: many legitimate travel complaints exist, but a pattern of unresolved high-severity complaints and name collisions with other ‘Wingo’ entities raises concern."

Reason: Multiple independent complaints and forum reports cite lost funds, refused refunds, or suspicious charges linked to the domain or similarly named services.

Blacklist & phishing status

Score: 85/100
Passed

"No active technical blacklists found, which lowers immediate phishing/drive-by malware risk; reputation issues remain separate."

Reason: No Google Safe Browsing hits and no crypto-scam blacklist matches.

Trademark / brand impersonation (USPTO)

Score: 40/100
Failed

"No direct trademark conflicts were found in the quick USPTO search; still confirm corporate filings if brand provenance matters for large transactions."

Reason: No USPTO trademark matches found for the exact query; absence of a trademark doesn't prove maliciousness, but increases need for caution with similarly named services.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Verify the booking or payment by calling the phone numbers listed on the site and confirm the reservation reference before paying.
  • 2
    Check your card issuer’s protections; prefer credit card or PayPal for purchase so you can dispute charges if needed.
  • 3
    Search recent, platform-specific reviews (Tripadvisor, reviews.io) for the exact domain and booking flow you will use, not just the brand name.
  • 4
    If you find signs of fraud after a payment, contact your bank immediately to open a dispute/chargeback and report the domain to consumer protection in your jurisdiction.
  • 5
    If you need a lower-risk option, book through a major travel aggregator or a well-known airline/reseller with an established refund policy.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →