WebVetted โ„ข Beta
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

UserBenchmark.com is a popular website offering benchmarking tools and market research on computer hardware, attracting about 7.4 million monthly visits globally, mostly from the United States. The site uses a variety of advertising and analytics technologies, has a secure SSL certificate valid through September 2026, and has been registered since 2013. It does not appear on cryptocurrency scam blacklists or Google Safe Browsing warnings. However, the site faces significant criticism for biased benchmarking results, particularly favoring Intel and NVIDIA over AMD products, inconsistent methodology due to unverified user-submitted data, and a defensive attitude toward critics. Though there are no reports of financial fraud or lawsuits, many tech communities advise caution, recommending alternative benchmarking tools for more reliable comparisons.

Confidence Score
65%

Risk Insights

๐ŸŒ

Long-Established Domain with Heavy Use

Registered since 2013 with maintained SSL certificate.
Around 7.4 million visits monthly, mainly from the U.S.
Popular among computer hardware users and enthusiasts.
โš ๏ธ

Significant Credibility Issues from Bias

Benched products show unfair preference for Intel/NVIDIA over AMD.
Criticism from multiple reputable tech forums and reviews.
Benchmark data reliability is questioned, reducing trust.
โœ…

No Scam or Malware Flags Detected

Not blacklisted for scams or phishing.
Secure HTTPS connection present.
No reports of financial fraud or malware infections.

Contradictory Signals

The site is popular and technically sound but suffers from credibility issues affecting user trust.

Signal A: High traffic and technically secure (SSL, no blacklists)

Signal B: Strong user complaints about bias and unreliable benchmarks

Category Scores

Identity 80/100
Reputation 40/100
Technical 85/100
Content 50/100
Legal 70/100
Business Validity 60/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Demonstrated bias in benchmarks, especially against AMD products, damaging site credibility.
  • Aggressive and unprofessional responses to criticism by the site and its operators.

๐Ÿ”Ž Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain Age and Registration Verification

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Long history and privacy protection but no public registrant identity; typical for large privacy-conscious sites."

Reason: Domain registered in 2013 and uses a reputable registrar with privacy protection.

SSL Certificate Status

Score: 90/100
Passed

"SSL strengthens trust by securing user data transmissions."

Reason: SSL certificate is valid, issued by a recognized authority, and not expiring soon.

Traffic Volume and Source Analysis

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Main traffic source is search, indicating legitimate discovery; low social and referral traffic."

Reason: High monthly visits (~7.4M) mainly from the United States showing strong organic user interest.

Technical Safety and Blacklist Checks

Score: 85/100
Passed

"No blacklist flags from crypto scam databases or Google Safe Browsing."

Reason: No detected malware, phishing, or scam flags from multiple security services.

Content and Methodology Reliability

Score: 30/100
Failed

"Community consensus is that data and rankings are unreliable and potentially misleading."

Reason: Benchmark results criticized for bias, poor verification, and unfair scoring, especially against AMD products.

Business Transparency and Ethics

Score: 40/100
Failed

"No clear corporate identity or team details, and hostile public communication style."

Reason: Owner anonymity and aggressive responses to criticism harm reputation and trustworthiness.

Legal and Dispute History

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Controversies exist but have not escalated to documented legal actions."

Reason: No known lawsuits or formal legal disputes related to the domain or service.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Consider using alternative benchmarking tools like PassMark, Cinebench, or TechPowerUp for hardware performance comparisons.
  • 2
    Avoid relying solely on UserBenchmark for critical purchasing decisions due to documented bias and inconsistent methodology.
  • 3
    Review user feedback and community discussions to gauge reliability before trusting benchmark results from this site.

Evidence & Citations