WebVetted β„’ Beta
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Turing.com is a technology platform specializing in matching top-tier remote software developers with companies, primarily in the US and Silicon Valley. It attracts around 1.5 million monthly visitors, with significant traffic from India and the US. The site uses reputable advertising and analytics services, employs secure SSL certificates with a trusted authority, and maintains active domain registration through GoDaddy. User reviews from developers highlight flexible remote work and career growth benefits, though some raise concerns about a rigorous vetting process and mandatory work hours overlapping US time zones. There are no official scam listings or phishing warnings, but some user forums debate assessment practices. Legal cases mentioning "Turing" relate to other entities and do not implicate this platform. The site's Google Places listing confirms a physical Palo Alto location with average user ratings and clear contact details, supporting its operational transparency.

Confidence Score
80%

Risk Insights

πŸ›‘οΈ

Established Technical Infrastructure

Valid SSL certificate from GlobalSign
Registered at GoDaddy with no recent changes
Use of recognized analytics and advertising
πŸ‘₯

Strong User Engagement

Around 1.5 million monthly visits globally
Primary traffic from India and US
Balanced traffic sources: direct and search
⚠️

Mixed User Reputation Signals

Positive developer reviews highlight career growth
Complaints about long vetting and US timezone work hours
Forum debates about assessment integrity and follow-up tactics

Contradictory Signals

Technical safety is clear, but some community feedback raises procedural concerns, not proven scams.

Signal A: No threats detected by Google Safe Browsing or scam blacklists

Signal B: User forum reports alleging assessment misconduct and aggressive recruiting follow-ups

Category Scores

Identity 85/100
Reputation 65/100
Technical 90/100
Content 70/100
Legal 80/100
Business Validity 80/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • User reports of aggressive communications after failed assessments or withdrawal attempts can raise concern for potential pressure tactics.
  • Forum critiques mention assessment questions copied from public sources and poor test relevance, implying possible quality issues in hiring procedures.

πŸ”Ž Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age, registrar and SSL

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Domain age and registrar details confirm stable, authentic setup without signs of recent suspicious ownership changes."

Reason: Domain registered via GoDaddy with valid SSL from GlobalSign expiring mid-2026, showing current and secure infrastructure.

Site traffic and audience quality

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Traffic sources are mostly direct and search, typical for a legitimate tech platform."

Reason: Site receives about 1.5 million monthly visits, with primary audiences in India and the US, indicating real user engagement.

Use of advertising and analytics tech

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Integration of paid and unpaid analytic and marketing technologies suggests professional operation standards."

Reason: The site uses well-known advertising networks (AdRoll, Facebook, Bing) and analytics tools (Google Analytics, Hotjar) contributing to reliable marketing intelligence.

Verified contact data and social media presence

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Includes careers, support, press contacts and active Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter pages."

Reason: Multiple official emails and social media accounts are publicly linked, supporting transparent communications.

Presence on scam or phishing blacklists

Score: 90/100
Passed

"This reduces suspicion of the domain being used in common scam or phishing activities."

Reason: No indications found on Google Safe Browsing or crypto scam blacklists.

Reputation and user feedback

Score: 65/100
Failed

"Discussion forums raise concerns over assessment quality and potential scam suspicion, but no definitive fraud evidence emerged."

Reason: Users praise flexible remote work and payments but criticize demanding vetting and US timezone overlap requirements, and some report aggressive follow-ups.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Review detailed user feedback about the vetting process to understand potential user concerns.
  • 2
    Monitor ongoing community discussions for updated reputational insights.
  • 3
    Verify employment offers carefully, avoiding sharing sensitive personal information prematurely.
  • 4
    Use official contact channels for inquiries to confirm legitimacy of specific opportunities.
  • 5
    Check for updates on any lawsuits directly involving this domain in the future.

Evidence & Citations