WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Totaladblock.com

Report Date October 6, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

⚠️ Mixed signals: totaladblock.com is a high-traffic ad‑blocking product (≈41–44 million monthly visits) with coverage in reputable tech sites, a valid SSL certificate, and modern hosting on AWS/Google Cloud. At the same time, multiple consumer complaint threads and review pages report unexpected or repeated charges and refund difficulties. Domain WHOIS shows registration in July 2020 with privacy protection, and company terms require arbitration and a class-action waiver — both worth checking before paying.

Confidence Score
73%

Risk Insights

🔎

Strong traffic but mixed trust signals

Site receives ~41–44M monthly visits and ranks ~#1,247 globally.
Independent reviews praise product effectiveness.
Multiple user reports raise billing and refund concerns.
🛡️

Technical hygiene is good

Valid Sectigo SSL (wildcard) through 2026.
DNS and hosting run on AWS/Google Cloud.
SPF and common email providers (Mailjet, SES, SendGrid) configured.

Contradictory Signals

Technical efficacy does not fully resolve user-reported billing misconduct; both can coexist.

Signal A: Multiple professional reviews rate product highly

Signal B: Numerous consumer complaints allege unauthorized charges and refund problems

Category Scores

Identity 70/100
Reputation 55/100
Technical 85/100
Content 80/100
Legal 60/100
Business Validity 75/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user reports alleging unexpected or repeated charges and difficulty obtaining refunds, including claims of several charges in a single day on some threads.
  • WHOIS privacy enabled (Whois Privacy Protection Service) hides the registrant and reduces operator transparency for consumers verifying legitimacy.
  • Terms of service require binding arbitration and include a class-action waiver, which limits consumers’ legal options and can indicate defensive legal posture.
  • Some consumer-facing help or refund guidance appears fragmented in third‑party help threads, suggesting possible support responsiveness issues.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age and registration

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Registered 2020-07-01 and recently updated; continuous activity and consistent analytics traffic back the registration age."

Reason: Domain created in July 2020 and continuously active, which favors legitimacy over fly‑by‑night scam domains.

Registrant transparency (WHOIS privacy)

Score: 50/100
Failed

"Registrant listed as Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc.; privacy is common but reduces traceability when disputes arise."

Reason: WHOIS privacy service is in use, which hides the operator and makes direct verification harder for consumers.

Traffic & popularity

Score: 90/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb and SimilarTech report consistent monthly visit counts and strong presence in multiple countries."

Reason: Very high global traffic (~41–44M monthly visits) and high global rank (≈#1,247), which is uncommon for outright fraud sites.

Technical security posture

Score: 88/100
Passed

"TLS valid through 2026; DNS hosted on Amazon name servers; SPF includes Mailjet/Amazon SES/SendGrid/Mandrill."

Reason: Valid Sectigo wildcard SSL, reputable DNS (AWS), and proper SPF records suggest legitimate email and hosting setup.

Third‑party reputation and reviews

Score: 55/100
Failed

"Cybernews and AllAboutCookies provide favorable technical reviews, while ProductReview and forum posts report repeated billing and refund disputes."

Reason: Professional reviews are positive but multiple consumer complaint threads allege billing abuse and refund problems, creating a mixed reputation signal.

Blacklist / malware indicators

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Fast checks returned no matched threats; no crypto scam blacklist hits in provided data."

Reason: No matches on quick Google Safe Browsing checks and not flagged by crypto scam lists in the quick evidence set.

Legal & refund policy risks

Score: 60/100
Failed

"Terms specify arbitration under AAA rules and provide a 30-day opt-out window for waiver; this is not unusual but is a consumer-friction signal."

Reason: Terms require binding arbitration and include a class-action waiver; these policies can make dispute resolution harder for consumers.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Do not provide payment details until you confirm the exact charge amount and billing cadence; screenshot pricing and terms before purchase.
  • 2
    If you see unexpected charges, contact your card issuer immediately to dispute unauthorized transactions and request a chargeback if needed.
  • 3
    Attempt to resolve with support (support@totaladblock.com / complaints@totaladblock.com) and keep timestamps/screenshots of all correspondence.
  • 4
    Check independent review sites (AllAboutCookies, Cybernews) for corroborating test results and official company contact paths before trusting refund promises.
  • 5
    If charges persist or refunds fail, report to your local consumer protection agency and consider filing a complaint with the card network.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →