WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Stocktwits.com

Report Date October 6, 2025
Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
Why we think so

Stocktwits (stocktwits.com) is a long‑standing social network for traders and investors with high traffic (about 15M monthly visits) and official contact points. ✅ Technical signals are strong: HTTPS, Cloudflare, Google MX/SPF records and a valid SSL. The platform hosts user-generated market commentary, so incorrect or manipulative posts are possible; several user-review sites record complaints about spam, bots, and alleged manipulation, but there is no authoritative public evidence that Stocktwits itself is operating a scam. Overall conclusion: established and technically well‑configured, but treat on‑site advice with caution and verify trading decisions with a licensed broker.

Confidence Score
83%

Risk Insights

✅

High traffic & active site

Estimated ~15M monthly visits and global rank ~4,644.
Strong engagement: ~3.9 pages/visit and long average session length (~415s).
⚠️

Content reliability risk

Many user reviews cite spam, bots, and alleged manipulation.
Stocktwits does not fact‑check user posts; treat trading tips as unverified signals.

Contradictory Signals

Large, well‑maintained platforms can still host noisy or malicious actors; popularity does not guarantee content quality.

Signal A: High traffic and strong technical hygiene

Signal B: Numerous user complaints about spam/bots and alleged manipulation

Category Scores

Identity 90/100
Reputation 75/100
Technical 90/100
Content 60/100
Legal 80/100
Business Validity 85/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user reviews allege spam, bots, and possible manipulation on the platform — indicates content risk rather than confirmed corporate fraud.
  • Platform is user‑generated and does not fact‑check posts, which can cause amplification of bad trading advice and rumors.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & registrar

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Long registration and stable registrar reduce likelihood of throwaway/fraudulent domain behavior; WHOIS registrant contact is not public, which is typical for many established sites."

Reason: Domain shows a long history with a creation timestamp indicating many years of registration and a reputable registrar (GoDaddy).

Traffic & popularity (engagement)

Score: 92/100
Passed

"High pageviews, long session time (~6:37) and multi‑page visits suggest active user engagement rather than an obscure or newly created scam site."

Reason: High monthly visits (~15M) and low global rank (~4,644) indicate broad usage and visibility.

Contact information & transparency

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Published support@ and newsroom@ addresses plus verified social links increase accountability; absence of phone numbers is common for modern web services."

Reason: Public support and newsroom email addresses and active corporate social profiles are present on the site.

SSL / DNS / Mail configuration

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Good email and DNS hygiene (Google MX + SPF) lowers phishing/spoof risk for official email channels; Cloudflare suggests DDoS/edge protection."

Reason: Valid SSL certificate, Cloudflare nameservers, and proper MX/SPF TXT records are configured.

Blacklist & browser safety checks

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Absence from these blacklists reduces immediate technical risk, though it doesn't eliminate user‑content risks."

Reason: No matches on crypto scam blacklist and Google Safe Browsing returned no threats in the evidence set.

Trademark / brand impersonation

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Lack of a USPTO hit here does not imply trademark clearance; deeper IP search would be required for legal certainty."

Reason: No USPTO trademarks returned for the 'stocktwits.com' query in the provided dataset.

User complaints & review signals

Score: 50/100
Failed

"These are primarily anecdotal and not confirmed by regulators, but they represent real reputational concerns and content moderation gaps."

Reason: Multiple user review sites report complaints about spam, bots, and alleged manipulation on the platform.

Content moderation / business model risk

Score: 60/100
Failed

"A user‑driven message board model creates inherent risks for financial decision‑making; users should not take posts as professional advice."

Reason: Platform is user‑generated and does not fact‑check posts, increasing the chance of misleading investment advice spreading.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    If you rely on Stocktwits content for trading ideas, verify any trade through a regulated broker or independent research before committing funds.
  • 2
    Use listed official emails (support@stocktwits.com or newsroom@stocktwits.com) for account or safety inquiries and avoid direct messages from unknown users asking for funds.
  • 3
    Report suspicious accounts or pump‑and‑dump behavior to Stocktwits support and, if financial loss occurs, preserve evidence and contact your broker and local regulator.
  • 4
    Check app download sources (official app store pages) and verify developer details before installing mobile apps.
  • 5
    Enable strong account protections (unique password, two‑factor authentication) and avoid sharing account credentials.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Vet another Website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any domain. Verify before you subscribe or shop!

Vet suspicious ticket resale websites

Scammers clone legitimate ticket exchanges or invent resale hubs that require wire transfers and Zelle deposits. ScamAI...

Read playbook →
Debunk fake news and review aggregators

Pseudo-news portals scrape legitimate outlets, tack on fake star ratings, and funnel traffic to shady merchants. ScamAI...

Read playbook →