WebVetted โ„ข Beta
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Spoofcard.com provides caller ID spoofing services, with over 6 million users primarily based in the United States. The site uses well-known technology platforms like Amazon Web Services and Cloudflare. It holds valid trademarks and has a secure, active web presence. However, user feedback shows mixed experiences: many complaints relate to billing errors, technical failures, and customer service issues. Though some users describe it as unreliable or even a "scam" due to refund difficulties, courts have found Spoofcard legally compliant and not directly liable for misuse of its service. The main risks arise from criminal use of spoofing, not from Spoofcard's own business practices. Overall, it is a legally operating service with noteworthy customer dissatisfaction and some risk of technical problems or billing disputes.

Confidence Score
73%

Risk Insights

๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ

Established Technical Infrastructure

Uses Amazon Web Services and Cloudflare for hosting.
Has a valid SSL certificate.
Registered with GoDaddy, a reputable registrar.
โš ๏ธ

Mixed User Sentiment

Many users report billing and refund problems.
Some customers claim the service is unreliable or a scam.
No direct evidence of fraud by the company itself.
โš–๏ธ

Legal Standing

Courts ruled SpoofCard not liable for misuse by users.
The service operates legally under US law.
The company challenges restrictive state laws actively.

Contradictory Signals

While legally compliant, customer satisfaction issues create trust concerns.

Signal A: Legitimate and legally compliant with valid trademarks and infrastructure.

Signal B: Frequent customer complaints and accusations of scams due to billing and service issues.

Category Scores

Identity 80/100
Reputation 45/100
Technical 75/100
Content 60/100
Legal 80/100
Business Validity 70/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • High volume of customer complaints about billing errors and refund difficulties, some labeling the service a scam.

๐Ÿ”Ž Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain and Technical Infrastructure Check

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Technical signals indicate a professionally managed site with industry-standard security and hosting."

Reason: The domain is well hosted with reputable providers, has a valid SSL certificate, and registered through a known registrar.

Traffic and User Base Assessment

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Traffic stats support a legitimate business serving a sizable user base."

Reason: Moderate web traffic and primarily US-based users suggest ongoing service usage and market presence.

Brand and Trademark Legitimacy

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Legal trademark registrations reduce risks of impersonation or fraud by third parties."

Reason: Active USPTO registered trademarks confirm official ownership and brand legitimacy.

Blacklist and Scam Database Check

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Clean status in major blacklist databases supports site trustworthiness."

Reason: No listings on crypto scam or phishing blacklists were found.

User Reviews and Reputation

Score: 40/100
Failed

"User reports do not suggest outright scam but show significant frustrations and service quality problems."

Reason: Numerous user complaints about billing, technical failures, and refund issues indicate moderate to high customer dissatisfaction.

Legal Compliance and Disputes

Score: 80/100
Passed

"The company complies with legal processes and disclaims misuse by end users."

Reason: Court rulings clear SpoofCard from liability for misuse by customers and confirm legality of its service under US law.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Verify billing statements carefully and keep records when using SpoofCard services.
  • 2
    Avoid relying on SpoofCard for critical or evidentiary call recording due to reported technical failures.
  • 3
    Report any suspicious or fraudulent activity linked to SpoofCard usage to appropriate authorities.
  • 4
    Consider alternative services if refund or customer support reliability is a priority.
  • 5
    Stay informed about the legal use of caller ID spoofing technologies in your jurisdiction.

Evidence & Citations