WebVetted โ„ข Beta
Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
Why we think so

Scopus.com is a legitimate academic database operated by Elsevier, serving as a leading abstract and citation resource for peer-reviewed literature across various scientific fields. The site receives roughly 7.5 million monthly visits globally, including substantial traffic from countries such as India and Indonesia. Technical infrastructure includes reputable services like Amazon hosting and Adobe Analytics, highlighting a mature, professionally maintained platform. While no direct scams or fraudulent activities are associated with scopus.com itself, there have been documented cases of fraudulent and hijacked journals indexed within the Scopus database, which misuse Scopus branding to deceive users. These issues affect the credibility of some indexed content but do not implicate the official website or its operators in scams.

Confidence Score
88%

Risk Insights

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Scopus.com is a widely used academic database with high traffic and stable technical foundations.

Well-established domain from 1992
~7.5 million monthly visitors worldwide
Professional hosting and analytics technology
โš ๏ธ

Incidents concern fraudulent journals indexed by Scopus, not scams on scopus.com itself.

Fake journals exploited Scopus branding for scams
Elsevier acts to remove fraudulent content
No direct reports of scam losses from the official website

Contradictory Signals

While scopus.com is authentic, some fraudulent actors misuse the Scopus brand through fake journals in the database, requiring user caution.

Signal A: Positive domain reputation and infrastructure

Signal B: Concerns about predatory journals indexed under Scopus

Category Scores

Identity 90/100
Reputation 85/100
Technical 85/100
Content 80/100
Legal 95/100
Business Validity 90/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Scopus database has been criticized for indexing some fraudulent or hijacked journals, which may mislead authors or readers.
  • Some reports highlight authors being scammed by fake journals exploiting Scopus branding, unrelated to scopus.com directly.

๐Ÿ”Ž Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain Age and Ownership

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Early registration date and reputable management support domain legitimacy."

Reason: Domain scopus.com was registered in 1992 and uses a reputable registrar with appropriate privacy and protections.

Website Traffic and Popularity

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Traffic patterns align with a respected educational database."

Reason: The site has about 7.5 million monthly visits with traffic from multiple countries, indicating genuine usage.

Technical Infrastructure

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Professional technology stack indicates serious operational investment."

Reason: Uses recognized technologies like Amazon hosting, Adobe products, React JS, and valid SSL certificates.

Blacklist and Scam Reports

Score: 90/100
Passed

"No negative listings found on scam monitoring services."

Reason: No indication of being blacklisted or on scam lists related to cryptocurrency or phishing.

Reputation in News and Reviews

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Research and news highlight issues within Scopus indexing but not scam activity of the platform."

Reason: No direct negative reviews for scopus.com; some criticism of indexed journals but not the site itself.

Contact and Social Presence

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Consistent social profiles reinforce authenticity."

Reason: Official social media links correspond to known Elsevier Scopus accounts; no suspicious contact info found.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Use scopus.com confidently for academic research and literature access.
  • 2
    Be cautious when interacting with individual journals claiming Scopus indexing; verify journal legitimacy independently.
  • 3
    Report any suspicious journal or publication practices encountered.
  • 4
    Monitor official Scopus communications for updates on indexing and content integrity.
  • 5
    Avoid providing payment or personal information to third-party sites claiming Scopus affiliation without verification.

Evidence & Citations