WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Nettokom.de

Report Date October 6, 2025
Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
Why we think so

nettokom.de appears to be the official site for NettoKOM, a German prepaid mobile brand tied to Netto Marken-Discount and Telefónica. The site has substantial traffic (~168k monthly visits), up-to-date news mentions in German tech press, working contact details (email + phone) and a valid TLS certificate. There are a few minor caution signals — a WHOIS record with limited public registrant data and an automated low trust score reported by a third-party aggregator — but multiple independent signals (high traffic, news coverage, Google Safe Browsing clean, established tech stack) point to a legitimate service. Verdict: ✅ Likely safe / trusted, but verify purchases and account actions through official retailer channels.

Confidence Score
83%

Risk Insights

🛡️

High local traffic and media presence

~168k estimated monthly visits, almost all from Germany.
Multiple German outlets (Teltarif, Golem, Telefónica press) reference NettoKOM promotions.
Traffic and coverage point to an active commercial service rather than a throwaway scam page.
⚠️

WHOIS privacy reduces traceability

WHOIS shows CSC name servers and no public registrar/creation date.
This is common for corporate domains but makes ownership checks harder.
Corroborate identity via parent company pages or retail listings.

Contradictory Signals

Automated reputation tools can flag domains for registration anomalies even when other evidence (traffic + press) points to a legitimate business. Manual verification of offers and payment flow is recommended.

Signal A: High traffic, news coverage, published contact details, no blacklist hits (positive signals).

Signal B: Third-party reputation aggregator (Scamadviser) reports a low trust score and WHOIS is redacted (negative signals).

Category Scores

Identity 85/100
Reputation 75/100
Technical 90/100
Content 85/100
Legal 60/100
Business Validity 80/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • WHOIS lacks public registrant and registrar fields and uses CSC name servers, which reduces transparency for direct ownership verification.
  • Algorithmic low-trust score reported by a third‑party (Scamadviser) in aggregated checks; these systems can be noisy but should prompt manual review.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain traffic & audience

Score: 90/100
Passed

"High traffic and page engagement (pages/visit ~3.94, time on site ~208s) reduce the likelihood this is a throwaway phishing domain."

Reason: Site shows substantial monthly visits (~168k) with a concentrated German audience, which matches an established national prepaid brand.

Technical infrastructure

Score: 92/100
Passed

"Cloudflare + bot-management and correct SSL make it harder for opportunistic impersonators to serve content at scale."

Reason: Modern stack (Adobe AEM), Cloudflare CDN & bot management and valid TLS indicate professional hosting and operations.

Contact details & customer support

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Presence of an official impressum and contact channels is typical for legitimate German businesses and required by law."

Reason: Site lists service email and a German phone number in the impressum/service pages, allowing customers to reach support directly.

Blacklist / phishing detection

Score: 95/100
Passed

"Clean results on major automated blacklists is a strong positive signal for user safety."

Reason: No hits on Google Safe Browsing and no crypto-scam blacklist entries were found in checks.

WHOIS transparency & ownership

Score: 45/100
Failed

"CSC is commonly used for corporate privacy/registry services, but the lack of visible registrant metadata reduces traceability."

Reason: Public WHOIS fields are sparse (no registrar/creation date) and name servers point to CSC, which limits direct evidence of ownership.

Third-party reputation signals

Score: 60/100
Failed

"Automated low trust scores often arise from mismatched registration data or domain history; correlate with other signals before acting."

Reason: Algorithmic reputation services (eg. Scamadviser aggregated in some crawls) have flagged a low trust score; these can be noisy but require human checking.

Trademark and brand impersonation (USPTO)

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Brand may be protected in Germany/EU rather than the US, so USPTO empty results are not definitive."

Reason: No USPTO trademark conflicts were found for the query, but absence in USPTO does not rule out legitimate EU/DE branding.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Verify the brand page from the known parent retailer (Netto Marken-Discount) or Telefónica Deutschland corporate pages before entering payment details.
  • 2
    Use the site’s listed phone number (+49 number from the impressum) or service@nettokom.de to confirm offers and activation procedures.
  • 3
    If buying in-person is possible, prefer purchasing the SIM starter pack at a Netto store and activate via official channels.
  • 4
    Avoid transferring money outside the site's secure checkout; check the checkout URL is on nettokom.de and TLS is valid before paying.
  • 5
    If you see contradictory claims (e.g., vastly different price/bonus offers), contact consumer protection or your bank and consider reporting suspicious pages.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →