WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Nairaland.com

Report Date October 6, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Quick scan summary: Nairaland is a long-running, high-traffic Nigerian discussion forum (registered 2005) with about 15.7 million monthly visits and a strong technical stack (Cloudflare CDN, HTTPS, Google analytics/GSuite). Safety signals are generally positive: no Google Safe Browsing hits and no crypto blacklist entries. The main risk is marketplace-style scams run by individual users inside forum threads — the site hosts many user reports and scam-watch threads. Verdict: ⚠️ Suspicious / Uncertain — the site itself appears legitimate, but treat peer-to-peer transactions on the forum as risky and verify counterparties.

Confidence Score
75%

Risk Insights

🛡️

High traffic, established domain

Registered in 2005 with ~15.7M monthly visits.
Major traffic from Nigeria (55%+).
Large user base makes the platform useful but also a target for scammers.
⚠️

Marketplace risk: user-to-user scams

Multiple community threads document money-loss incidents.
Moderation exists but cannot guarantee every transaction.
Avoid direct peer-to-peer payments without verification or escrow.

Contradictory Signals

Site-level legitimacy contrasts with risky user-to-user transaction behavior; treat the platform as legitimate but user deals as higher risk.

Signal A: Large, long-running community with heavy traffic (positive reputation)

Signal B: Frequent user reports of money-loss in transactions (negative trust for P2P deals)

Category Scores

Identity 70/100
Reputation 65/100
Technical 85/100
Content 55/100
Legal 80/100
Business Validity 80/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Repeated user reports of losing money in peer-to-peer deals arranged through forum threads (marketplace risk).
  • WHOIS uses privacy/Domain Protection Services which hides registrant contact details.
  • Limited corporate contact information scraped from the site (no clear published business support email).

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Identity (WHOIS & ownership)

Score: 70/100
Failed

"Registration date (2005) and registrar DomainSite are positive signals, yet the registrant contact is protected by Domain Protection Services, so contacting an operator directly is harder."

Reason: Domain is long-established (registered 2005) which supports legitimacy, but registrant details are privacy-redacted which reduces direct traceability.

Reputation (traffic, user reports, news)

Score: 65/100
Failed

"SimilarWeb/SimilarTech show ~15.7M monthly visits and Nigeria as the largest traffic source; user complaints and scam-watch threads are common and affect trust for financial transactions."

Reason: High traffic and many years of activity indicate a real community, but numerous forum threads document user-to-user scams in marketplace sections.

Technical signals (CDN, SSL, DNS, SPF)

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Cloudflare name servers and A records observed; SPF and MX entries present; SSL currently valid (certificate valid through late 2025), which is a strong technical posture."

Reason: Uses Cloudflare, valid HTTPS certificate, and has MX/SPF records — these reduce some technical attack surface and help email verification.

Content & moderation

Score: 55/100
Failed

"Community maintains scam-alert lists and incident threads, which shows active moderation and user self-policing, but the open-forum model still allows fraudulent listings and impersonation."

Reason: Forum content is user-generated and includes scam-report threads; moderation exists but cannot prevent every bad actor in peer-to-peer deals.

Legal / trademark checks

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Searches returned no USPTO records tied to the domain and news results do not show lawsuits naming Nairaland as a defendant in the provided dataset."

Reason: No USPTO trademark matches or reported legal actions in the provided news results, reducing immediate legal risk signals.

Blacklist & phishing

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Automated blacklist checks returned no matched threats and crypto-scam sniffer reports clean."

Reason: No flags from Google Safe Browsing and not present on the provided crypto-scam blacklist.

Business validity (operations, monetization)

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Technologies include Google Adsense/DoubleClick, Google Analytics, and G Suite for email — signs of a maintained, monetized site."

Reason: Evidence of monetization (ads), analytics and use of Google services suggests an operating business model rather than an ephemeral scam site.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Avoid sending money to strangers found only via Nairaland; use escrow/verified marketplaces for purchases.
  • 2
    When dealing with a seller/buyer, verify phone numbers and cross-check usernames in scam-watch threads before transacting.
  • 3
    If scammed, collect thread links, screenshots, phone numbers and report to the forum moderators and local authorities.
  • 4
    Prefer transactions with vendors that have external reputations (established e-commerce stores, traceable businesses).
  • 5
    Monitor Google Safe Browsing and similar blacklist services for changes and re-check domain reputation before sharing sensitive info.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →