WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Liltv.me

Report Date October 7, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Quick take: liltv.me is a small streaming/download site with modest real traffic and active social profiles, but several ordinary trust gaps that warrant caution. The domain was registered on 2021-01-25 and uses privacy-protected WHOIS plus Cloudflare nameservers. Traffic signals (Alexa ~65k, ~3 pageviews per visit, ~4.6 minutes on site) show real user activity from countries including Iran, the US and the UK. There are no Google Safe Browsing or crypto-blacklist matches, and no USPTO trademarks. Still, the site publishes no contact email or phone on the site, the WHOIS is private, and the site’s content category (movies/TV streaming) often attracts copyright and takedown risk — so avoid payments and verify before trusting the site. ⚠️

Confidence Score
50%

Risk Insights

🛡️

No blacklist hits — but limited transparency

Google Safe Browsing and crypto blacklist checks returned no threats.
WHOIS privacy and missing site contact reduce traceability if problems arise.
Good sign technically, but not sufficient to trust for payments.
⚠️

Real traffic, content risk remains

Alexa ~65k and multi-minute sessions suggest genuine visitors.
Category (streaming/downloads) often exposes users to copyright or malware risks.
Avoid paying for downloads or ‘unlock’ offers on such sites.

Contradictory Signals

The site behaves like an active service but lacks the transparency expected for a legitimate business that accepts payments.

Signal A: Traffic metrics indicate real engagement (Alexa rank, session length).

Signal B: WHOIS privacy and no contact email make operator hard to verify.

Category Scores

Identity 60/100
Reputation 50/100
Technical 65/100
Content 40/100
Legal 35/100
Business Validity 50/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • WHOIS is privacy‑protected with no public registrant contact, which reduces traceability.
  • No site-exposed email or phone; only social links — harder to escalate problems or verify ownership.
  • Category content (movie/TV downloads/streams) commonly hosts infringing material and can distribute malware via download links.
  • SimilarWeb snapshot shows visits then a zero value in latest snapshot, which could indicate measurement gaps or intermittent availability.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

WHOIS & domain age

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Registration in 2021 (expires 2026) suggests the domain is not brand-new, but the registrant uses a privacy service which reduces operator transparency."

Reason: Domain registered on 2021-01-25 and not newly created, which is a positive signal for persistence.

Technical infrastructure

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Cloudflare nameservers are present (jill/graham) which is common and indicates a basic level of infrastructure; absence of SSL entries in the provided extract means you should still check the live site for a valid TLS certificate."

Reason: Uses Cloudflare nameservers and shows normal DNS A-record; no TLS warnings reported in evidence.

Traffic & engagement

Score: 65/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb shows several hundred visits per month in mid‑2025, though a zero snapshot in Aug 2025 suggests intermittent measurement or downtime; visitor geography includes Iran, US, UK."

Reason: Alexa rank ~65k, ~3 pageviews/visitor and high session length indicate real engagement rather than a parked or empty domain.

Ownership & contact transparency

Score: 30/100
Failed

"Social media profiles exist but without verifiable business contact info on the site; this reduces ability to escalate complaints or verify identity."

Reason: No email or phone on site and WHOIS uses a privacy service; contacting the operator may be difficult.

Blacklist & malware checks

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Absence of blacklist flags lowers immediate fraud/malware suspicion, but lack of matches does not guarantee safety — check links and downloads carefully."

Reason: No matches found in Google Safe Browsing and crypto scam scanner shows not blacklisted.

Trademark & brand impersonation

Score: 80/100
Passed

"No USPTO hits reduce legal impersonation concerns in the US, but brand conflicts can still exist outside USPTO records and for similar domain names."

Reason: No USPTO trademark records for 'liltv.me' were found in the search.

Third‑party reputation signals

Score: 50/100
Failed

"Scam tracking sources note a medium trust score (not outright flagged), so the site sits in a neutral-to-caution area; look for up-to-date user reviews."

Reason: Public safety checkers report medium trust scores; no strong positive reviews or large-scale complaints found.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Do not enter payment or personal financial details on this site until you verify the operator via an independent channel.
  • 2
    Check account/checkout pages for HTTPS and a valid TLS certificate before submitting data; prefer sites with clear contact email and address.
  • 3
    Search for recent user reviews (site name + “review”, “scam”, or “complaint”) and check major scam trackers and forum threads for recent reports.
  • 4
    If you see offers to pay for downloads or unlocks, treat them as high risk — avoid and consider using legal streaming services instead.
  • 5
    If you believe you encountered a scam or malware on the site, report the URL to Google Safe Browsing and to the registrar/abuse contact shown in WHOIS.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →