WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Getrelatio.com

Report Date October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Quick verdict: getrelatio.com shows real traffic and standard technical protections, but multiple independent user reports and review-site warnings point to risky billing and cancellation practices. Traffic is substantial (about 427k visits in September 2025) and the site uses Cloudflare, HTTPS and mainstream payment processors (Stripe, PayPal). The domain was registered May 19, 2023 and WHOIS uses a proxy service. App-store reviews and third‑party watchdogs describe unexpected charges and hard-to-cancel subscriptions. Overall: proceed with caution — avoid entering payment details until you verify billing terms and try a low‑risk test purchase or payment method.

Confidence Score
60%

Risk Insights

⚠️

Billing complaints are the main risk

Multiple independent reviews (App Store, Play Store) mention unexpected charges and cancellation friction.
Even with Stripe/PayPal, unclear terms can lead to legitimate-looking but unwanted recurring charges.
Verify subscription length, trial terms, and exact charge amounts before entering payment data.
✅

Technical posture is strong

Uses Cloudflare, HTTPS and common analytics (Amplitude).
No active malware/phishing flags in automated scans.
Multiple contact emails and social profiles are available for escalation.

Contradictory Signals

The site is widely used and technically sound, yet user-reported billing problems create legitimate consumer risk.

Signal A: High traffic and mainstream payment processors (positive trust signals)

Signal B: Multiple user reports of deceptive billing and opaque cancellation (negative trust signals)

Category Scores

Identity 70/100
Reputation 42/100
Technical 82/100
Content 60/100
Legal 60/100
Business Validity 55/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user complaints about unexpected subscription charges and hard-to-cancel processes (App Store and Play Store reviews).
  • WHOIS uses privacy proxy and registrant contact appears masked (c/o whoisproxy.com), limiting easy verification of company owners.
  • Third‑party trust tools flag suspicious signals (misleading social links, AI‑generated content warnings) even while giving middling scores.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & WHOIS transparency

Score: 60/100
Failed

"You can verify business identity by requesting company registration details or VAT/tax ID; the current WHOIS output lists 'c/o whoisproxy.com' and an Alexandria, VA proxy address."

Reason: Domain is relatively new (registered 2023-05-19) and WHOIS is masked by a privacy proxy, which reduces transparency for ownership verification.

Traffic & usage signals

Score: 85/100
Passed

"High traffic suggests a real, used product but also makes negative user reports more visible; check recency of complaints in your market."

Reason: Estimated monthly visits are high (~427k in Sep 2025) with a majority US audience; site shows normal engagement metrics.

Technical security & infra

Score: 88/100
Passed

"SSL valid through 2025-11-21 and DNS configured with Cloudflare nameservers; technical setup reduces risk of phishing but does not prove fair business practices."

Reason: Site uses HTTPS, Cloudflare CDN, standard DNS and valid SSL; payment stack includes Stripe and PayPal — all positive infrastructure signals.

Payments & billing transparency

Score: 40/100
Failed

"Even with legitimate payment processors, opaque billing terms or hidden recurring charges can cause consumer loss; confirm trial/cancellation flow before subscribing."

Reason: Multiple user reports allege unclear subscription terms and unexpected charges, which is a direct commercial risk.

Contact information & escalation paths

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Presence of contacts (support@, billing@) is good; test response time with a billing question before paying for service."

Reason: Site publishes several support and billing email addresses and has active social profiles, which helps escalate disputes.

Blacklist / malware checks

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Automated scans clear the site today, but these checks do not detect deceptive billing or low-quality service."

Reason: No Google Safe Browsing hits and not flagged by crypto scam lists; automated checks show no active malware or phishing.

Trademark & brand impersonation

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Lack of trademark doesn't prove legitimacy; it simply shows no registered mark in the USPTO database for the query."

Reason: No USPTO trademarks found for 'getrelatio', reducing one form of impersonation risk.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Do not enter full payment details until you confirm the exact billing model and cancellation method. Read the subscription policy and terms of use first.
  • 2
    If you must try the service, use a credit card or payment method that offers easy dispute/chargeback options and limit the amount.
  • 3
    Search recent app-store reviews (Google Play, Apple App Store) for posts about billing and cancellation; prioritize complaints within the last 6–12 months.
  • 4
    If charged unexpectedly, contact your bank immediately to dispute the charge and request a chargeback; keep timestamps and screenshots.
  • 5
    Report recurring deceptive billing to your local consumer protection agency or to platforms (App Store/Play Store) if cancellation is blocked or unclear.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →