WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Gamovation.com

Report Date October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Quick scan verdict: ⚠️ Suspicious / Uncertain. gamovation.com is an established game developer domain (registered 2010) with legitimate technical signals (valid SSL, Cloudflare, Google-hosted email) and measurable traffic (~67k monthly visits). Public coverage shows product reviews and press for multiple casual games. However, app-store and review-site complaints about in-app purchases, lost progress, and poor support are recurring. There are no safety blacklists or Google Safe Browsing detections. Recommendation: proceed with caution—avoid buying in-app items until you confirm current support and clear refund policies.

Confidence Score
70%

Risk Insights

🛡️

Long-standing developer domain

Domain registered in 2010 and still active.
WHOIS shows registrant country Netherlands (privacy applied).
Long age typically reduces the chance of throwaway scam domains.
⚠️

Mixed reputation from app stores

Multiple user complaints about paid features and support.
No clear evidence of widespread financial fraud, but consumer risk for purchases exists.
Check recent reviews before buying in-app items.
✅

No technical blacklist flags

Google Safe Browsing and crypto blacklist checks returned clean results.
Site uses SSL and modern CDN which reduces phishing/malware risk.

Contradictory Signals

Traffic and press show real product distribution, while user reports indicate recurring operational or customer-service problems; both can be true simultaneously.

Signal A: High organic traffic and press coverage (suggests legitimate business activity).

Signal B: Multiple user complaints about paid features and poor support (suggests consumer risk).

Category Scores

Identity 85/100
Reputation 55/100
Technical 80/100
Content 65/100
Legal 70/100
Business Validity 70/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user reports of lost access to paid features, buggy purchases, and poor support for mobile apps.
  • Some site pages and listings are minimal or thin (limited public-facing corporate detail), which makes verification of claims slower.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain WHOIS & age

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Registered October 15, 2010; registrar Key-Systems/TransIP nameservers; WHOIS uses privacy service but shows registrant country Netherlands — long registration is a positive identity signal."

Reason: Domain registered in 2010 and maintained under a reputable registrar with normal DNS.

SSL & hosting hygiene

Score: 80/100
Passed

"SSL valid through late 2025; site served with nginx and Cloudflare CDN which is typical for legitimate sites and improves basic security/misuse resilience."

Reason: Valid SSL certificate present and Cloudflare/standard stack in use.

Traffic & audience signals

Score: 75/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb reports tens of thousands of visits and top countries NL, IN, US; traffic mix (search + direct) suggests organic interest rather than a throwaway marketing funnel."

Reason: Consistent, non-trivial traffic (~67k monthly visits) and multi-country audience.

Reputation & user complaints

Score: 50/100
Failed

"Multiple app reviews describe losing paid features or rewards and getting limited support; complaints are about product quality and support rather than direct theft, but they raise consumer risk for purchases."

Reason: App-store and review sites show repeated complaints about paid features, lost progress, and poor support.

Blacklists & phishing reports

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Scanners and blacklist lookups returned clean results — no phishing/malware flags found in the evidence set."

Reason: No matches on crypto scam lists and Google Safe Browsing shows no threats.

Trademark / brand conflict check

Score: 60/100
Passed

"Search for matching trademarks returned no results; absence of conflicts reduces risk of brand-impersonation legal issues but does not affect product quality."

Reason: No USPTO trademark records returned for the query.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Check recent app-store reviews for the specific app you plan to use and filter by recent dates to see if payment/support issues persist.
  • 2
    Avoid making in-app purchases until you can confirm working purchase/refund flows or get a direct, verified response from their support email (info@gamovation.com).
  • 3
    If you already paid and lost access, collect receipts and contact the platform (App Store / Google Play) and request a refund through their dispute process.
  • 4
    Test contact responsiveness: send a short support request to info@gamovation.com and expect a reply within 48–72 hours before buying.
  • 5
    Report unresolved fraud or charge issues to your payment provider and the app platform if purchase features fail or are misrepresented.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →