WebVetted Beta
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

⚠️ Fetish.com appears to be a long‑running adult dating/community site with real traffic and standard infrastructure (Cloudflare, HTTPS, PayPal/Stripe). That said, user reports note fake profiles, subscription cancellation difficulties, and mixed reviews — so treat it with caution and avoid sending money or sharing sensitive documents.

Confidence Score
70%

Risk Insights

🛡️

High traffic, older domain

≈718k monthly visits and registration dating to 1995 suggest an established platform.
High pages/visit (~7) implies engaged users rather than transient click-farms.
⚠️

User complaints about cancellations & fake profiles

Aggregated reviews report fake/bot accounts and difficulty cancelling subscriptions.
These issues pose financial risk even when the operator is legitimate.

Contradictory Signals

Technically legitimate infrastructure and scale conflict with practical consumer complaints; that yields a cautious verdict.

Signal A: High traffic + mainstream payments + long domain age (signals of legitimacy)

Signal B: Multiple user complaints about fake profiles and billing (signals of poor user experience and potential monetization risks)

Category Scores

Identity 70/100
Reputation 55/100
Technical 85/100
Content 60/100
Legal 70/100
Business Validity 75/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • User complaints about fake profiles/bots and reports of difficulty cancelling memberships could lead to wasted payments.
  • Mixed review/trust scores in third‑party sites — not outright scam listings but enough complaints to reduce confidence.
  • Some contact details and registrant email look routed through third‑party addresses (registrant email: info@konzert.de), which may complicate accountability.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & WHOIS

Score: 85/100
Passed

"Older domains with a registrant are usually more stable; WHOIS lists Ideawise Limited and a Hong Kong contact, which is consistent with an operating business."

Reason: Domain is long‑established (registered 1995) with a visible registrant organization, which reduces the likelihood of a throwaway scam.

Traffic volume & engagement (SimilarWeb)

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Traffic concentrated in the UK and US; stable monthly visit estimates across recent months support continuity rather than a transient scam campaign."

Reason: High monthly visits (~718k) and strong pages/visit (~7) point to a real, active user base and consistent site usage.

Technology & infrastructure (SimilarTech)

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Presence of Cloudflare, HTTPS and bot management reduces technical risk from obvious compromises or takeovers."

Reason: Site runs standard tech (Cloudflare, HTTPS, analytics, bot management) and supports mainstream payment processors — a technically mature setup.

Payments & monetization

Score: 78/100
Passed

"Mainstream processors imply business legitimacy, though they do not guarantee good customer service or absence of fake profiles."

Reason: Multiple known payment providers (PayPal, Stripe, card networks) are integrated, giving users dispute options if charges are problematic.

Contact details & support

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Public support emails are a positive signal, but response quality and speed should be tested by contacting support directly."

Reason: Site lists support and data protection emails plus social accounts, which facilitates user communication and takedown requests.

Reputation & user reports

Score: 45/100
Failed

"Multiple complaint types (fake profiles, cancellation difficulty) were surfaced by review aggregators — these are practical risks for paying users."

Reason: Third‑party reviews and aggregated search results report fake/bot profiles and cancellation issues, lowering trust.

Blacklist / phishing status

Score: 90/100
Passed

"No active phishing/malware flags were found in the scanned lists at time of check."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing and crypto scam checks returned clean results.

Trademark conflicts (USPTO)

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Absence of USPTO entries doesn't guarantee no global trademark issues, but no direct US trademark conflict was detected."

Reason: No matching USPTO trademarks were found for the exact query, reducing immediate brand‑infringement concerns in US filings.

Local business listings / maps

Score: 40/100
Failed

"For consumer trust, a verifiable business address or maps listing helps; fetish.com shows registrant address in WHOIS but no formal Google Places entry."

Reason: No Google Places / Maps physical listing found, which is typical for online-only communities but reduces traceable local presence.

News and third‑party coverage

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Press coverage is mostly neutral or directory‑style; coverage does not allege large‑scale fraud but includes context about risks on adult platforms generally."

Reason: Site appears in mainstream lists and articles about BDSM dating sites, which supports legitimacy and public recognition.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Do not make large or irreversible payments before verifying — prefer PayPal/credit card so you can dispute charges if needed.
  • 2
    Verify account and membership cancellation terms; test cancellation on a small purchase to confirm process.
  • 3
    Check support@fetish.com for a response time and save all receipts and correspondence for disputes.
  • 4
    Avoid sharing personal ID, bank details, or sexually explicit materials that could be used for extortion.
  • 5
    If you see suspicious profiles or potential scams on the site, report them through the site’s contact email and keep screenshots.

Evidence & Citations