Recommendation

Caution

Overall Summary

Suspicious

Why we think so

Faire (faire.com) is a large, established wholesale marketplace with multi‑million monthly visits and enterprise infrastructure (AWS, Cloudflare, Stripe integrations). ✅ The site shows many technical trust signals: valid SSL, many domain verification TXT records, official social profiles, and broad press coverage. ⚠️ However, independent user reports and BBB/perplexity summaries show recurring complaints about account suspensions, disputed charges, shipping/duty issues, and uneven customer support — plus recent high‑profile litigation (resolved in Faire’s favor). Bottom line: platform appears legitimate but carries operational/financial risk for some sellers and buyers, so proceed with caution.

Confidence Score

75%

Risk Insights

🛡️

Large, technically robust marketplace

About 5.9M monthly visits and strong engagement metrics suggest real, regular usage.

Uses AWS, Cloudflare, Stripe and multiple verification TXT records — enterprise architecture.

No active blacklist or malware flags observed.

⚠️

Operational risk from user complaints

Repeated reports of account suspensions, disputed charges, and customs fees appear in BBB and user writeups.

Complaints affect sellers and buyers differently — vendors risk lost inventory; buyers report billing and duty surprises.

Contradictory Signals

Technical and scale signals point to a legitimate platform, but operational complaints create real financial risk for some users — treat the site as legitimate but operationally risky.

Signal A: High traffic, enterprise hosting, and many domain verifications (positive trust signals).

Signal B: Numerous user complaints about money lost, account suspensions, and disputed charges (operational risk).

Category Scores

Identity 65/100

Reputation 68/100

Technical 88/100

Content 78/100

Legal 72/100

Business Validity 80/100

Red Flags & Warnings

Multiple user reports of account suspensions and unrecovered inventory, which led some sellers to report financial loss and poor support resolution.
Complaints about unexpected/customs charges and unauthorized billing practices that some users describe as effectively losing money on orders.
WHOIS shows registrant privacy (Identity Protection Service), which reduces transparency about the listed registrant organization.
Past high‑profile litigation (Tundra v. Faire) and many customer complaints to consumer bodies (BBB), increasing reputational friction for users to navigate.
Some user reviews allege unresolved chargebacks and slow/templated customer responses, which raises operational risk for financial disputes.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age and registrar

Score: 90/100

Passed

"Long registration date (1998) and Amazon Registrar listing support continuity; low risk from age/registrar vector."

Reason: Domain registered in 1998 and maintained under a reputable registrar, indicating long‑standing operation.

WHOIS transparency

Score: 45/100

Failed

"Privacy services are common for corporations, but they make ownership verification harder for third parties and raise a minor caution flag."

Reason: Registrant details are masked by an identity protection service, reducing direct transparency about the owner.

Technical security and infrastructure

Score: 92/100

Passed

"Multiple TXT records for Google, Stripe, HubSpot, and other providers plus valid SSL and reputable DNS point to active security and domain control."

Reason: Site uses enterprise hosting (AWS), CDN (Cloudflare), valid SSL, and standard email/SPF/TXT verifications.

Blacklist / phishing checks

Score: 95/100

Passed

"Automated threat sources show no active flags for malware/phishing; still monitor over time for new reports."

Reason: No matches in Google Safe Browsing and no crypto‑scam blacklist matches.

Traffic, popularity and usage signals

Score: 88/100

Passed

"Traffic and engagement metrics are consistent with a broadly used B2B marketplace serving many retailers."

Reason: High monthly visits, low bounce, and long time on site indicate real user engagement.

Reputation and user complaints

Score: 60/100

Failed

"Patterns in complaints (suspensions, charge disputes, customs fees) are operational concerns that have persisted in public reporting."

Reason: Significant numbers of complaints to BBB and independent writeups describing unresolved financial disputes and account issues.

News & public records

Score: 80/100

Passed

"Business Wire, Bloomberg, Reuters, and Forbes coverage supports that Faire is an established marketplace with outside investment."

Reason: Coverage in reputable outlets and corporate press releases indicates legitimate business operations and investor interest.

Trademark conflicts (USPTO)

Score: 85/100

Passed

"Empty USPTO result set reduces risk of active trademark dispute on the exact query, though brand trademarks may exist under related terms."

Reason: No USPTO matches for 'faire.com' in quick search; no immediate trademark conflict found.

Your Next Steps

1

If you plan to buy or sell, test with a small transaction first and use a payment method that offers buyer/seller protection.
2

Search recent BBB and forum complaints for the specific use case (seller payouts, account suspensions, customs fees) before committing large inventory or funds.
3

Document and retain all order confirmations, shipping receipts, and support correspondence in case you need dispute evidence.
4

Consider contacting Faire support for a pre‑sale policy clarification (returns, disputed charges, duty handling) and keep proof of their written responses.
5

If you’re a vendor, avoid shipping high‑value inventory until payment terms and account stability are confirmed; maintain parallel sales channels.

Evidence & Citations

SimilarTech site profile for faire.com — traffic and tech stack
Shows ~5.9M monthly visits, AWS hosting, Cloudflare, and many ad/analytics integrations — strong enterprise signals.
Website traffic metrics (Alexa, bounce, time on site)
Alexa rank ~2,035, daily time on site ~8m23s and bounce ~30% — consistent with active marketplace usage.
Aggregated user complaints and analysis (summarized)
Compiles BBB and third‑party writeups showing repeated complaints: account suspensions, disputed charges, customs/duty problems.
WHOIS & DNS records for faire.com
Domain created 1998, registrar Amazon Registrar, extensive TXT verifications present, registrant masked via an identity protection service.
Google Safe Browsing / crypto blacklist status
No active malware/phishing flags; crypto scam sniffer reports domain not blacklisted.

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →

🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →

Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →