WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Digitalizardiptv.org

Report Date December 29, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

digitalizardiptv.org is a recently registered IPTV service domain with very low web traffic, no presence on major social media, and no verified physical or legal listings. Its WHOIS data shows privacy protection and a short registration age, which raises caution. Automated trust checks conflict, with some rating it legitimate and others flagging potential scams. User reports highlight mixed experiences: the trial period often works well with plenty of channels, but many complain about service failures or access loss after payment. No lawsuits or legal disputes are publicly recorded. Overall, the site carries notable risk for end users and needs careful trial testing before payment.

Confidence Score
43%

Risk Insights

⚠️

Domain Age and Privacy Service

Registered in August 2025
WHOIS privacy hides owner data
Common trait in risky IPTV services
❓

User Experience Conflicts

Good channel variety during trials
Reported failures and lost access after payment
Mixed trust scores from scanners

Contradictory Signals

Conflicting automated trust assessments highlight the need for caution and direct user testing.

Signal A: Gridinsoft rates domain legitimate (72/100 trust score)

Signal B: Scamadviser flags domain as potential scam with low trust score

Category Scores

Identity 35/100
Reputation 40/100
Technical 50/100
Content 45/100
Legal 60/100
Business Validity 40/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Low domain age and WHOIS privacy conceal ownership details.
  • User reports indicate unreliable service after payment despite a good trial experience.
  • Very low traffic and no engagement signals suggest possible minimal use or new/barely functioning site.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain Age and Ownership

Score: 35/100
Failed

"A new domain with privacy can be a warning sign, especially for IPTV services known for volatility."

Reason: Domain registered very recently and uses WHOIS privacy service, reducing transparency.

Traffic and Usage Metrics

Score: 30/100
Failed

"Low or no traffic suggests the service is either very new or barely used, which can indicate low reliability."

Reason: No measurable visits or engagement according to SimilarWeb data.

Contact Information Availability

Score: 40/100
Failed

"Lack of contact information diminishes trust and makes customer support unlikely."

Reason: No contact emails, phones, or social profiles found on the website.

Blacklist and Malware Checks

Score: 70/100
Passed

"No direct evidence of malware or phishing risks is a positive signal."

Reason: No blacklist or phishing alerts found and Google Safe Browsing shows no threats.

Reputation via User Reports

Score: 35/100
Failed

"Although trials may work well, the main service stability and reliability are questioned."

Reason: Mixed user reviews, with many complaints about service failures after payment.

Legal and Trademark Checks

Score: 60/100
Passed

"Absence of legal claims is positive, but does not confirm legitimacy due to other concerns."

Reason: No trademark conflicts or legal disputes found.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Test the service using a free trial before any payment.
  • 2
    Use secure payment methods that offer fraud protection.
  • 3
    Check updated reviews and scam reports frequently.
  • 4
    Avoid sharing personal or financial information until confident of legitimacy.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Vet another Website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any domain. Verify before you subscribe or shop!

25 Common Website Scams & How To Avoid Them

Scam types: Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials; Audit clone banking sites before customers log in; Investigate crypto investment landing pages

Read playbook →
Scam Encyclopedia

Browse platform-specific scams / red flags and see real-world encounters curated by our analysts.

Read playbook →