WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Cloaked.app

Report Date October 8, 2025
Recommendation
Proceed
Overall Summary
Safe
Why we think so

Quick verdict: Cloaked.app looks like a legitimate consumer privacy product with real traffic, press coverage, and standard site controls — not a clear scam. ✅ It serves ~100K monthly visits (mostly U.S.), uses Cloudflare and Amazon hosting, offers Stripe/G Suite integrations, and appears in TechCrunch and PCMag coverage. There are some usability and billing/support complaints in user reviews and community threads, so treat higher-risk actions (payments, giving sensitive IDs) with normal caution.

Confidence Score
80%

Risk Insights

🟢

Active product with real users

SimilarWeb reports ~100K monthly visits and strong U.S. share.
Engagement metrics (time on site, pages/visit) are consistent with a functioning service.
Multiple press reviews and funding mentions confirm market presence.
⚠️

Service-quality concerns exist

User complaints center on billing, trial/cancellation expectations, and response times.
Phone-number reuse practices have been flagged in community threads as a privacy tradeoff.
These are operational risks rather than proof of fraud.

Contradictory Signals

Operational complaints contrast with strong technical and press signals; treat as service-quality risk when transacting.

Signal A: High traffic, press coverage, vendor integrations (supports legitimacy)

Signal B: User reports of billing issues and privacy tradeoffs (reduces trust for payments)

Category Scores

Identity 85/100
Reputation 80/100
Technical 88/100
Content 75/100
Legal 80/100
Business Validity 78/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user complaints about billing transparency, free trial handling, and slow customer support raise service-quality concerns.
  • Some community discussion flagged phone-number recycling behavior as a privacy concern; that may affect specific privacy guarantees for reused aliases.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain technology & infrastructure

Score: 88/100
Passed

"Detected Cloudflare nameservers, Amazon IPs, CDN and payment verification TXT entries (Stripe/Google). This mix matches a professionally operated web app."

Reason: Uses Cloudflare CDN, AWS hosting, Stripe and Google integrations that are typical for legitimate SaaS providers.

Traffic volume & geography (SimilarWeb)

Score: 84/100
Passed

"SimilarWeb shows ~103K visits with 93–94% from the U.S. and moderate engagement (time on site ≈172s, pages/visit ≈2.7)."

Reason: Consistent monthly visits (~103K) and high U.S. traffic share suggest an active user base rather than a throwaway scam landing page.

Contact details & social presence

Score: 72/100
Passed

"Scraper found social links (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter) but no public support phone or contact email exposed via the scraper output; that increases friction for users who need quick help."

Reason: Social accounts for the brand exist (Instagram, Facebook, Twitter) but explicit business contact details on the site are sparse.

WHOIS / DNS / SSL health

Score: 86/100
Passed

"SSL issued recently and currently valid; multiple TXT records for Google verification and Stripe verification present, plus SPF including Google and Mailchimp."

Reason: Valid SSL cert and standard DNS records (Cloudflare NS, MX using Google) indicate correct domain operations.

Trademark / brand impersonation (USPTO)

Score: 80/100
Passed

"USPTO query returned zero elements for the exact query; this doesn't rule out other jurisdictions or unregistered marks."

Reason: No USPTO matches for 'cloaked.app' in the provided search, reducing immediate brand-conflict concerns.

Blacklist / phishing checks

Score: 90/100
Passed

"Scans returned no matched threats on the provided blacklist sources; continue periodic checks as status can change."

Reason: No matches on crypto scam lists and no Google Safe Browsing threats, indicating low immediate abuse signals.

News & reputation checks

Score: 82/100
Passed

"Multiple articles (TechCrunch, PCMag, Crain's) and funding mentions show an operating startup; public reviews note usability/billing complaints but not fraud."

Reason: Coverage in mainstream tech outlets and review sites supports legitimacy and business visibility.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    If you plan to pay or provide identity documents, verify billing terms and the refund policy before purchase.
  • 2
    Check the app's listing (App Store / Google Play) for recent reviews and developer responses to support/billing complaints.
  • 3
    Use a temporary payment method (card with tokenization) or Stripe when possible, and avoid sharing full SSNs or bank details unless explicitly required and justified.
  • 4
    If you encounter suspected fraud or unauthorized charges, contact your bank/card issuer and report the incident to the platform (App Store / Google Play) and Cloaked support.
  • 5
    For enterprise or high-risk use, request an official business contact and contract terms from Cloaked before onboarding.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →