WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Chat-avenue.com

Report Date October 9, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

Quick take: Chat-Avenue is a long-lived, high-traffic web chat network (about 6.2 million visits/month) that uses Cloudflare/HTTPS and a standard web stack, but it attracts frequent user complaints about scams, blackmail and poor moderation. The domain was registered in 2000 and uses WHOIS privacy with a registrant listed in China; Google Safe Browsing shows no active blacklist hits. Bottom line: the site itself appears technically legitimate, but user-facing safety risks are real — treat interactions there with caution. ⚠️

Confidence Score
53%

Risk Insights

🌐

High traffic, high exposure

About 6.2M visits/month and large US/UK audience.
Popular sites attract opportunistic scammers in open chats.
Higher exposure means more moderation required to stay safe.
⚠️

User reports of scams and blackmail

Multiple independent review sites and complaint boards note money-loss reports.
Common issues: fake profiles, paid promises that deliver nothing, and extortion.
Take reports seriously even if the company is not legally charged.

Contradictory Signals

A well-established site can still host harmful behavior; technical legitimacy does not equal safe user experience.

Signal A: Long domain age and stable tech stack

Signal B: Consistent user reports of scams and moderation failures

Category Scores

Identity 50/100
Reputation 30/100
Technical 80/100
Content 40/100
Legal 60/100
Business Validity 55/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Multiple user reports describing scams, blackmail and lost money on the platform.
  • High anonymity in chat plus large, international user base increases likelihood of encountering scammers.
  • Registrant WHOIS is privacy/redacted and lists a registrant country of China, which reduces transparency about ownership.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Domain age & WHOIS transparency

Score: 50/100
Passed

"Age supports legitimacy, but redacted WHOIS and foreign registrant country lower identity confidence; keep records of any payment receipts if you need to escalate."

Reason: Long-registered domain (since 2000) but WHOIS details are privacy/redacted with registrant country listed as China, which reduces ownership transparency.

Traffic & popularity

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Large audience increases both utility and exposure to bad actors; high traffic alone is not a safety guarantee."

Reason: High, sustained traffic (~6.2M monthly) and significant U.S./UK audience — indicates a widely used platform rather than a short-lived scam site.

Technical security posture

Score: 80/100
Passed

"Good TLS setup reduces simple spoofing or credential interception risks, but does not prevent user-to-user scams inside chat rooms."

Reason: Uses HTTPS and Cloudflare; valid SSL certificate observed — site is properly configured for baseline transport security.

Reputation & user reports

Score: 25/100
Failed

"Anecdotal reports cannot prove every claim, but their volume and consistency are concerning — treat user stories seriously when they repeat similar patterns."

Reason: Multiple complaint threads and review pages report scams, blackmail and poor moderation; user reports are consistent across sources.

Blacklist and phishing checks

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Absence from blacklists reduces the chance the site is an outright phishing/scam farm, but it doesn't remove in-room scams."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing and not flagged by crypto scam lists; no phishing blacklist hits returned in evidence.

Trademark or impersonation risk

Score: 60/100
Passed

"No registered trademark doesn't mean there are no impersonation complaints elsewhere; monitor if you see direct brand-copying."

Reason: No USPTO trademark results found for the exact query; low risk of modern brand confusion or active USPTO disputes.

Business contactability

Score: 55/100
Passed

"Contact info exists, but reports indicate support and moderation responses may be limited or disputed by users."

Reason: Public admin email (admin@chat-avenue.com) and social accounts are available, which helps reporting and recovery actions.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Do not share personal, financial, or identity documents in any chat rooms; treat private messages as untrusted.
  • 2
    If you paid or were extorted, document timestamps and screenshots and report the incident to local law enforcement and to the platform using admin@chat-avenue.com.
  • 3
    Use browser safety tools and block/unfriend suspicious accounts; consider reporting profiles to the platform and taking screenshots for evidence.
  • 4
    For parents: block or restrict access to the site on family devices and discuss risks of anonymous chat with teens.
  • 5
    If you need to verify the business, check payment receipts and bank statements before disputing charges with your card issuer.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Scan another website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any website URL. Verify before you trust!

Spot fake SaaS login pages before handing over credentials

Phishing crews spin up carbon-copy login portals for CRM and finance tools, siphoning credentials before users realize t...

Read playbook →
Analyze giveaway landing page phishing

Giveaway pages entice with consoles or flights, then harvest card data and selfies “for verification.” ScamAI checks reg...

Read playbook →