WebVetted ™ Beta
+ New Report

Domain Due Diligence
Report for Aicleaner.app

Report Date October 8, 2025
Recommendation
Caution
Overall Summary
Suspicious
Why we think so

⚠️ Quick verdict: infrastructure looks normal (Google hosting, valid SSL, organic traffic ~90k/mo), but multiple independent user reports and tech writeups accuse the related “AI Cleaner” apps of aggressive billing, unexpected charges, and data-loss issues. There’s no public lawsuit or Google blacklist, yet user complaints and chargeback discussions make this a cautionary case.

Confidence Score
48%

Risk Insights

⚠️

Billing complaints surfaced repeatedly

App-store reviews and aggregated reports describe unexpected weekly charges and difficulty canceling subscriptions.
If you see a $6.99/week trial conversion in receipts, treat it as a high-risk billing pattern.
✅

Technical setup looks standard

Google DNS/MX and HTTPS are configured correctly.
Traffic volume (~91.7K/mo) suggests active usage rather than a throwaway landing page.

Contradictory Signals

Technical legitimacy doesn't rule out abusive business practices like predatory subscriptions or poor data-handling.

Signal A: Valid Google hosting, SSL, and non-trivial traffic

Signal B: Consistent user reports of fraud and data loss for similarly named apps

Category Scores

Identity 60/100
Reputation 30/100
Technical 70/100
Content 50/100
Legal 40/100
Business Validity 45/100

Red Flags & Warnings

  • Repeated user reports of aggressive subscription billing and difficulty canceling, including allegation of $6.99/week conversions.
  • Third-party scam-check sites and forums flag similarly named domains (ai-cleaner.pro) for phishing or low trust, increasing impersonation risk.
  • No direct business contact (email/phone) scraped from the domain; only social links, which harms accountability for refunds/support.
  • Multiple user reports claim data loss (photos, contacts) when using comparable cleaner apps; that risk may apply here too.

🔎 Detailed Checks & Analysis

Traffic & Usage (SimilarWeb / SimilarTech)

Score: 70/100
Passed

"Traffic numbers are non-trivial but engagement metrics show a high bounce rate (~64%), which could indicate poor UX or misaligned user expectations rather than clear legitimacy."

Reason: The domain shows meaningful traffic (~91.7K visits/month) and a U.S. lead country, indicating active usage rather than an abandoned throwaway site.

Technical Infrastructure (DNS, SSL, MX)

Score: 75/100
Passed

"Configuration reduces common hosting-related scam flags (e.g., anonymous cheap hosting), but it does not guarantee honest business practices."

Reason: Google-managed nameservers, Google MX, valid SSL certificate and site verification TXT records are present, which is typical for professionally hosted services.

Reputation & User Reports

Score: 25/100
Failed

"Aggregated complaints and blog posts show a pattern of billing and data issues; these are strong reputational negatives even if not proven in court."

Reason: There are numerous user complaints and app-store reviews alleging aggressive billing, unauthorized charges, and data loss tied to similarly named 'AI Cleaner' apps.

Blacklist & Malware Scans

Score: 65/100
Passed

"Absence from blacklists reduces immediate malware/phishing concern, but blacklists lag real-time user-experience problems like billing abuse."

Reason: No matches on Google Safe Browsing or crypto scam blacklist were found in the collected evidence.

Contactability & Support Channels

Score: 30/100
Failed

"Limited direct contact information complicates refunds and dispute resolution and is a red flag for consumer-facing subscription services."

Reason: No dedicated customer-service email or phone number was scraped from the domain; only social media links were found.

Trademark & Brand Conflicts

Score: 60/100
Passed

"Lack of trademark registration does not mean a site is illegitimate, but it increases the chance of name collisions and impersonation by similarly-named domains."

Reason: USPTO search returned no matching trademarks for the query, so no immediate brand-infringement evidence was found.

Media Coverage & Third-Party Reviews

Score: 55/100
Passed

"Coverage includes neutral product roundups and how-to lists; independent investigative reports about fraud specific to this domain are lacking."

Reason: Several tech sites and reviews mention AI Cleaner apps; coverage is mixed but shows the product category is widely discussed.

Your Next Steps

  • 1
    Avoid entering payment details on the site or linked apps until you verify billing terms in the App Store listing and subscription receipts.
  • 2
    If charged unexpectedly, contact your card issuer immediately and consider a chargeback; preserve screenshots and receipt emails.
  • 3
    Check App Store review history and the exact app bundle ID before installing; prefer apps from established publishers with support contact info.
  • 4
    Backup important data (photos, contacts) before using any automated cleaner app and test on a small dataset first.
  • 5
    Report suspicious charges or app behavior to the platform (Apple/Google) and to consumer protection channels if needed.

Evidence & Citations

🕵🏻 Keep investigating

Recommended →
🌐 Vet another Website

Run another instant due diligence scan on any domain. Verify before you subscribe or shop!

Vet suspicious ticket resale websites

Scammers clone legitimate ticket exchanges or invent resale hubs that require wire transfers and Zelle deposits. ScamAI...

Read playbook →
Debunk fake news and review aggregators

Pseudo-news portals scrape legitimate outlets, tack on fake star ratings, and funnel traffic to shady merchants. ScamAI...

Read playbook →